Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 30;40(2):253–258. doi: 10.5114/ada.2023.126323

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the patients, and results and findings of laser speckle contrast analysis examinations

No. Sex Age Hurley Stage Type of surgical intervention Localization of the excised lesion Area marked by the laser operator [mm2]
Detection perfusion impairment of the local skin flap
 1 M 46 III Flap + ADM Right armpit 10 094
 2 W 44 III Flap Right groin 4 405
 3 W 53 III Flap Right armpit 8 170
 4 W 52 III Flap Right groin 3 770
 5 W 27 III Flap Left groin 7 991
 6 M 22 III Flap Left groin 10 195
 7 M 54 III Flap Underbelly/Lower abdomen 2 958
 8 W 48 III Flap Left groin 6 042
 9 W 24 III Flap Left groin 7 426
 10 M 51 III Flap + ADM Left armpit 18 302
 11 W 49 III Flap Left armpit 4 137
 12 M 36 III ADM + STSG Right armpit 17 169
 13 M 36 III Flap Left armpit 5 909
 14 M 36 III Flap Buttocks 14 968
Assessment of focal HS
 15 W 46 III Flap Left armpit 8 444
 16 W 53 III Flap Right armpit 8 170
 17 M 36 III Flap Buttocks 14 968
Assessment of the healing process
 18 M 31 III ADM + STSG Buttocks 19 215

HS – hidradenitis suppurativa, ADM – acellular dermal matrix, STSG – split thickness skin graft.