Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 12;21(6):e08025. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8025

Table 2.

Batch‐to‐batch analysis of the NF

Parameters NF (produced with soy peptone in the fermentation media) NF (produced without soy peptone in the fermentation media) Method of analysis
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8
Composition
6′‐SL sodium salt (% w/w DM) 87.0 92.0 90.0 92.0 92.0 91.0 93.0 95.0 HPLC‐CAD (validated internal method)
Sialic acid (% w/w DM) 5.1 3.5 4.9 4.3 5.4 1.8 0.1 0.2 HPLC‐CAD (a) (validated internal method)
d‐Glucose (% w/w DM) < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 HPLC‐PAD (b) (validated internal method)
d‐Lactose (% w/w DM) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 HPLC‐PAD (b) (validated internal method)
Sum of 6′‐sialyllactulose and 3′‐SL sodium salts (% w/w DM) 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 1.7 0.5 0.3 HPLC‐CAD (a) , (c) (validated internal method)
Sum of other carbohydrates (% w/w DM) 6.6 3.3 3.8 2.5 1.4 5.0 5.8 3.8 Calculation (d)
Water (% w/w) 5.3 5.0 5.4 5.6 5.0 7.9 8.4 8.6 JP 2.48 (e) – Karl Fischer titration (volumetric/coulometric titration)
Ash (% w/w DM) 11.6 11.7 11.3 11.1 11.2

JP 2.44 (e)

(residue on ignition, gravimetry)

Protein (% w/w) ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 Bradford assay (f) (spectrophotometry)
Sodium (% w/w DM) 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.6

USP 233 (g)

(ICP‐MS or ICP‐OES)

pH (5% solution, 25°C) 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.1 5.9 5.8 JP 2.54 (e) (potentiometry)
Contaminants
Arsenic (mg/kg) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.01 (i) < 0.01 (i) < 0.03 (i)

USP 233 (g) , (h) (ICP‐MS)

AOAC (2019) 999.10

and 2011.14 (i)

(AAS and ICP‐OES)

Cadmium (mg/kg) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.01 (j) < 0.01 (j) < 0.01 (j)

USP 233 (g) , (h) (ICP‐MS)

AOAC (2019) 999.10

and 2011.14 (j)

(AAS and ICP‐OES)

Lead (mg/kg) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.02 (k) 0.03 (k) < 0.02 (k)

USP 233 (g) , (h) (ICP‐MS)

AOAC (2019) 999.10

and 2011.14 (k)

(AAS and ICP‐OES)

Mercury (mg/kg) ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 ≤ 0.05 < 0.004 (l) < 0.004 (l) < 0.004 (l)

USP 233 (g) , (h) (ICP‐MS)

US EPA, February 2007,

Method 7473 (l)

(AAS)

Aflatoxin M1 (μg/kg) < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02

AOAC 2000.08 (m)

(HPLC)

Microbial parameters
Total plate count (CFU/g) < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 ISO 4833‐1:2013 (n) (colony count)
Yeasts and moulds (CFU/g) < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 10 (o) < 10 (o) < 10 (o) ISO 21527‐2:2008 (p) (colony count)
Enterobacteriaceae (in 10 g) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ISO 21528‐1:2017 (detection or qualitative method)
Salmonella spp. (in 25 g) ND ND ND ND ISO 6579‐1:2017 (detection or qualitative method)
Cronobacter spp. (in 10 g) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ISO 22964:2017 (detection or qualitative method)
Listeria monocytogenes (in 25 g) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ISO 11290‐1:2017 (detection or qualitative method)
Presumptive Bacillus cereus (CFU/g) < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10

ISO 7932:2004 (q)

(colony count)

Endotoxins (EU/mg) 0.006 0.011 0.020 0.034 0.026 < 0.0002 (r) < 0.0002 (r) < 0.0002 (r) JP 4.01 (e) (kinetic‐turbidimetric method)

‘–’: Not reported; 6′‐SL: 6′‐Sialyllactose; 3′‐SL: 3′‐Sialyllactose; AAS: Atomic absorption spectroscopy; AOAC: Association of Official Analytical Collaboration; CFU: Colony forming units; DM: Dry matter; EU: Endotoxin units; HPLC‐CAD: High‐performance liquid chromatography – charged aerosol detection; HPLC‐PAD: High‐performance liquid chromatography – pulsed amperometric detection; ICP‐MS: Inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry; ICP‐OES: Inductively coupled plasma – optical emission spectroscopy; ISO: International Organisation for Standardisation; JP: Japanese Pharmacopoeia; LOD: Limit of detection; LOQ: Limit of quantification; MW: Molecular weight; ND: Not detected; US EPA: United States Environmental Protection Agency; USP: United States Pharmacopoeia; w/w: Weight per weight.

(a)

For batches #1 to #5, the LOD and LOQ for sialic acid, 6′‐sialyllactulose and 3′‐SL sodium salts are, respectively, 0.03% w/w DM and 0.2% w/w DM (as 6′‐SL sodium salt). For batches #6 to #8, the LOD and LOQ for sialic acid are, respectively, 0.15% w/w DM and 0.45% w/w DM (as sialic acid); the LOD and LOQ for 6′‐sialyllactulose + 3′‐SL sodium salts are, respectively, 0.13% w/w DM and 0.18% w/w DM (as 6′‐SL sodium salt).

(b)

For batches #1 to #5, the LOD for d‐glucose and d‐lactose is 0.02% w/w DM, and their LOQ is 0.05% w/w DM (as d‐lactose). For batches #6 to #8, the LOD for d‐glucose and d‐lactose is 0.05% w/w DM, and their LOQ is 0.05% w/w DM (as d‐glucose and d‐lactose, respectively).

(c)

6′‐sialyllactulose and 3′‐SL sodium salts peaks on the HPLC‐CAD chromatograms overlap.

(d)

Sum of other carbohydrates = 100% w/w DM – 6′‐SL (acid) (% w/w DM) – quantified carbohydrates (i.e., sialic acid, d‐glucose, d‐lactose, 6′‐sialyllactulose (acid) and 3′‐SL (acid); % w/w DM) – sodium (% w/w DM). Concentrations in acid form for the respective carbohydrates have been theoretically calculated.

(e)

Consistent with the compendial method specified in the 17th edition of the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (2016).

(f)

Evaluated using a limit test at 100 ppm.

(g)

Method is consistent with the compendial method specified in the United States Pharmacopoeia 35th revision (2011). Batches #1 to #5 were analysed by ICP‐MS (LOQ = 1.25%). Batches #6 to #8 were analysed by ICP‐OES (LOQ = 0.005%).

(h)

LOQ for arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury is 0.05 mg/kg.

(i)

Method based on AOAC (2019) 999.10 and 2011.14. LOD = 0.01 mg/kg. LOQ = 0.03 mg/kg.

(j)

Method based on AOAC (2019) 999.10 and 2011.14. LOD = 0.01 mg/kg. LOQ = 0.03 mg/kg.

(k)

Method based on AOAC (2019) 999.10 and 2011.14. LOD = 0.02 mg/kg. LOQ = 0.03 mg/kg.

(l)

Method based on U.S. EPA, February 2007, Method 7473, Mercury Analyser. LOD = 0.004 mg/kg. LOQ = 0.01 mg/kg.

(m)

LOQ = 0.02 μg/kg.

(n)

LOD = 10 CFU/g.

(o)

LOD = 10 CFU/g (in‐depth plating).

(p)

LOD = 100 CFU/g (surface plating).

(q)

LOD = 10 CFU/g.

(r)

LOQ = 0.0002 EU/mg.