Skip to main content
. 2023 May 23;14(6):766–776. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00056

Table 2. In Vitro Activity of Selected Compoundsa.

compound EC50 hPPARα (μM ± SEM)b hill slope maximal relative activation of hPPARβ/δ (% ± SEM)c,e maximal relative activation of hPPARγ (% ± SEM)d,e clogPf ligand efficiencyg
A229 (6l) 0.59 ± 0.051 1.4 12.1 ± 1.0 11.2 ± 3.0 4.8 0.341
3g 0.083 ± 0.011 2.2 31.1 ± 1.0 22.5 ± 6.7 5.4 0.347
6d 0.080 ± 0.032 1.0 25.1 ± 4.1 35.7 ± 4.2 5.7 0.343
6j 0.064 ± 0.018 1.8 6.1 ± 3.6 9.3 ± 2.3 5.7 0.337
8b 0.30 ± 0.096 1.5 21.1 ± 6.2 19.9 ± 10.3 4.6 0.317
GW7647 0.0057 ± 0.00029 1.8 N.D. N.D. 7.0 0.340
a

EC50 values and maximal relative activation were calculated as mean ± SEM of at least two independent experiments performed in triplicate.

b

Full dose–response curves are shown in the Supporting Information (Figure S9).

c

Maximal relative activation of hPPARβ/δ refers to the activity of known PPARβ/δ agonist GW0742 at 0.0075 μM concentration, which was defined as 100% activation.

d

Maximal relative activation of hPPARγ refers to the activity of known PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone at 2.5 μM concentration, which was defined as 100% activation.

e

For PPARβ/δ and PPARγ assays, a six-point dose–response range was completed for each compound ranging from 13 nM to 100 μM (13 nM, 77 nM, 463 nM, 3 μM, 17 μM, and 100 μM). Because of observed cytotoxicity at 100 μM for several compounds, the agonism level at 17 μM was selected as the point of comparison. N.D. = not determined.

f

Calculated logP (clogP) values were predicted using ADMETlab 2.0.19

g

Ligand efficiency (LE) values were calculated using the equation: LE = (1.37/the number of heavy atoms) × pEC50.20