Table 4.
Configurations and results of the mediation models
| Model # | IV | M | DV | Direct effect | Indirect/mediation effect | 95% CI of mediation effect | Total effect | Mediation type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trt | ITI | Fid | 1.207* (0.497) | 1.036* | 0.377, 1.791 | 2.242*** (0.61) | Partial mediation |
| 2 | ITI | Fid | AET | −0.014*** (0.004) | 0.019* | 0.012, 0.027 | 0.005 (0.003) | Inconsistent mediation |
n = 43,
p < .05,
p < .01,
p < .001.
IV = predictor, M = mediator, DV = outcome, ITI = change score of teachers’ intentions to implement EBPs. Fid = change score of intervention fidelity of PCBM. Trt = treatment vs control conditions. Statistics in the parentheses are standard errors. A mediation effect is considered significant if its 95% confidence interval based on 5000 bias corrected bootstraps (CI; two tailed) does not include 0. Three decimals are reported to enhance precision