Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2022 Nov 11;24(3):552–566. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01464-3

Table 4.

Configurations and results of the mediation models

Model # IV M DV Direct effect Indirect/mediation effect 95% CI of mediation effect Total effect Mediation type
1 Trt ITI Fid   1.207* (0.497) 1.036* 0.377, 1.791 2.242*** (0.61) Partial mediation
2 ITI Fid AET −0.014*** (0.004) 0.019* 0.012, 0.027 0.005 (0.003) Inconsistent mediation

n = 43,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.

IV = predictor, M = mediator, DV = outcome, ITI = change score of teachers’ intentions to implement EBPs. Fid = change score of intervention fidelity of PCBM. Trt = treatment vs control conditions. Statistics in the parentheses are standard errors. A mediation effect is considered significant if its 95% confidence interval based on 5000 bias corrected bootstraps (CI; two tailed) does not include 0. Three decimals are reported to enhance precision