Skip to main content
editorial
. 2023 Jun 7;11(6):e23.00077. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00077

Table 3.2.

Comparison of AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS

Characteristic AMSTAR-2 ROBIS
Access https://amstar.ca/Amstar-2.php http://www.bristol.ac.uk/population-health-sciences/projects/robis/robis-tool/
User guidance Extensive Extensive
Review type applicability Intervention Intervention, diagnostic, etiology, prognostica
Number of domains 7 critical, 9 non-critical 4
Items
Total number 16 29
Response options Items # 1, 3, 5, 6, 10, 13, 14, 16: rated yes or no.
Items # 2, 4, 7, 8, 9b rated yes, partial yes, or no.
Items # 11b, 12, 15: rated yes, partial yes, no, or no meta-analysis.
24 assessment items: rated yes, probably yes, no information, probably no, or no.
5 items regarding level of concern: rated low, high, or unclear.
Overall rating
Construct Confidence based on weaknesses in critical domains. Level of concern for risk of bias.
Categories High, moderate, low, and critically low Low, high, unclear
a

ROBIS includes an optional first phase to assess the applicability of the review to the research question of interest. The tool may be applicable to other review types in addition to the four specified, although modification of this initial phase will be needed (Personal Communication via email, Penny Whiting, 28 Jan 2022).

b

AMSTAR-2 item #9 and #11 require separate responses for RCTs and NRSI.