Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019 Nov 22;2(12):5848–5858. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00833

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Size and zeta potential characterization of the NPs with different formulations. (A) Size variations in particles with different HP to CS ratio. (B) Zeta potential characterization of different nanoparticle formulations. All the DLS and zeta potential measurements were done using 10 acquisitions of six sample, a laser intensity of 850 nm and the fixed angle of 90° was used at RT. Data all n = 6, mean ± SD. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups as determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc (p < 0.05). (C) Representative TEM image of NPs from the F3 formulation (scale bar = 200 nm).