Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Mar 7;188(1):283–293. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06158-y

Table 3.

Mediation analysis of racial disparities for TNBC by socioeconomic status, family history, physical activity, anthropometrics and reproductive history

Estimate 95% CI
lower limit
95% CI
upper limit
Proportion
mediated (95%
CI)
Cardiometabolic risk factorsa (3 vs 0) 0.48 (0.17–1.25)
 Natural direct effect 1.40 0.89 2.19
 Natural indirect effect 1.26 1.01 1.58
 Total effect 1.76 1.19 2.59
Physical activity
 Natural direct effect 1.94 1.53 2.46 c
 Natural indirect effect 1.00 0.98 1.02
 Total effect 1.94 1.53 2.45 c
Parity
 Natural direct effect 1.99 1.56 2.54
 Natural indirect effect 0.95 0.92 0.98
 Total effect 1.89 1.48 2.42
Breastfeeding among parous women (≥ 6 months per child) 0.03 (0.01–0.04)
 Natural direct effect 1.97 1.55 2.52
 Natural indirect effect 1.01 1.00 1.02
 Total effect 2.00 1.57 2.55 c
Low socioeconomic status (SES) (2 vs 0)b
 Natural direct effect 2.25 1.62 3.12
 Natural indirect effect 0.88 0.75 1.03
 Total effect 1.98 1.48 2.63

In the mediation analysis, we adjusted for age, family history of breast cancer, different WHI study subcohorts (observational study or clinical trials and different treatment assignments for all 4 clinical trials), cardiometabolic risk factors, physical activity, parity, breastfeeding, and socioeconomic status except for the variable being assessed as a mediator

a

Metabolic dysfunction was assessed by four cardiometabolic risk factors, including elevated WC, self-reported history of diabetes, high cholesterol, and hypertension. We summed the four components with a total score from 0 to 4. A higher score indicates higher metabolic dysfunction. We collapsed scores of 3 and 4 due to a small sample size in the score of 4

b

We assigned 1 point for education being high school degree or lower, 1 point for annual family income < $20,000, and 1 point for NSES lower than 20% of the population, and summed for a total score from 0 to 3; scores of 2 and 3 were collapsed. A higher score indicates low SES

c

Since the natural direct effect and natural indirect effect are in opposite direction, it is not meaningful to estimate the proportion mediated