Skip to main content
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care logoLink to Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
. 2023 Apr 17;12(4):637–643. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1450_22

Retrospective analysis of patients with surgically proven ovarian torsion, our experience

Rami Shwyiat 1, Omar A Taso 1,, Fatima Al-Edwan 1, Basel Khreisat 1, Ammal Al-Dubees 1
PMCID: PMC10259567  PMID: 37312776

ABSTRACT

Aim:

To study the patients who were admitted to our hospital with surgically proven ovarian torsion and were operated for the same and to study for whom detorsion was done.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis of the medical records and surgical notes of 150 patients with surgically proven ovarian torsion over a 10-year period between January 2011 and January 2021 was carried out. Surgical notes included details like mode of the surgery (laparotomy or laparoscopy), type of surgery (oophorectomy, detorsion, detorsion with cystectomy), whether fixation was done or not, size of mass/ovary, laterality, appearance of the torted ovary, color of the ovary, and number of twists. Histopathologic reports of the patients who underwent oophorectomy or detorsion with cystectomy were also recorded.

Results:

During the 10-year study period, 88 (58.7%) patients had undergone laparotomy and 62 (41.2%) patients had undergone laparoscopy. Detorsion with cystectomy was done in 96 (64%) cases, detorsion alone in 14 (9.3%) cases, and oophorectomy was done in 40 (26.6%) cases. There was no significant difference in terms of increase in postoperative complications.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic detorsion with cystectomy is the most common surgical procedure used for ovarian torsion at King Hussein Medical Center.

Keywords: Laparoscopic, oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, torsion

Introduction

Twisting of the adnexal pedicle usually involves tube and ovary, but 5% of the time, isolated tubal torsion is involved.[1] The ovaries are nonfixed organs that are supported and connected to the uterus by the utero-ovarian (UO) ligament, also known as the ovarian ligament.[2]

When an adnexal mass is present, it is most commonly a benign functional ovarian cyst or teratoma. The right adnexa is more likely to twist than the left, suggesting that the sigmoid colon may help prevent torsion.[3] Torsion happens 80% unilaterally with slight predominance to the right adnexa/ovary due to the longer right ligament of the ovary and also because the space occupied by the sigmoid colon on the left side protects the left ovary.[4,5,6] There are no specific size criteria for ovarian torsion, but one study found that 83% of torsion occurred in ovaries that were 5 cm or larger.[7] Ovarian torsion has been reported to occur with masses from 1 to 30 cm (mean 9.5 cm), but it can happen with a mass of any size.[8]

Adnexal torsion is reported in approximately 3% of all emergent gynecologic surgeries.[9] Torsion of normal ovaries occurs more commonly in young girls than in women.[10,11] Ovarian torsion most commonly (70%–80%) occurs in women of reproductive age (between 20 and 40 years of age).[12,13,14]

Ovulation induction may cause multiple large ovarian follicular cysts; the large cysts carry an increased risk of torsion.[15]

The most common symptoms are sudden onset of abdominal pain that is intermittent, nonradiating, and associated with nausea and vomiting, and fever.[16,17]

The onset of pain in ovarian torsion (OT) may also follow a chronic, intermittent, or subacute course, which makes the diagnosis much more difficult.[18] Owing to its nonspecific symptoms and lack of a specific diagnostic test and management guidelines, it can cause diagnostic dilemma and delay in management. However, it should be suspected in any woman in the reproductive age group with sudden-onset abdominal pain, especially with a known risk factor for ovarian torsion.[19] Ovarian torsion eventually leads to occlusion of the vascular supply, hemorrhagic infarction, and necrosis of the ovary. However, due to the dual blood supply, partial torsion, or intermittent detorsion, ovaries that appear necrotic on laparoscopy can often remain viable. The long-term effect on fertility is not known.[20]

No single or combined markers have been identified that improve diagnostic accuracy in adnexal torsion. Transvaginal ultrasound remains the first-line investigation.[21] The absence of radiological suggestion of adnexal torsion should not rule out the diagnosis, especially if the symptoms are persistent and severe enough to decide on performing surgery.[21]

A torsed ovary may be rounded and enlarged compared to the contralateral ovary because of edema or vascular and lymph engorgement.[22,23] An ultrasound can easily distinguish an ovarian mass by its components, location, density, Doppler flow, and size. There can be decreased or absent Doppler flow in the vessels of a torted ovary.[24,25,26]

The most common sonographic sign is asymmetric ovarian enlargement to greater than 5 cm, while obstruction to venous outflow can manifest in stromal edema and heterogenous appearance of the ovary. The “whirlpool sign” is another sonographic finding that may be present, although it cannot be reliably obtained in all cases. Conversely, free pelvic fluid is another finding that may be present, although it is quite nonspecific for ovarian torsion.[27] Oophorectomy was frequently performed in these cases due to the fear of leaving necrotic ovary tissue, suspicion of malignancy, and the risk of venous thromboembolism and peritonitis.[28,29,30] However, thromboembolism has not been reported particularly often.

Conservative surgery for maintaining ovarian preservation in young women has been given increasing attention in recent years, but it remains difficult to solve the problem on how to avoid thromboembolism and ensure the recovery of ovarian blood supply function.[31] Consequently, ovarian detorsion with ovarian preservation is considered as a safe procedure that should be considered in menopausal patients.[32,33] The increased use of detorsion has been followed by isolated reports of recurrence of ovarian torsion.[34,35,36]

The main objective of this study was to present and analyze our experience in preserving the adnexa following laparoscopic detorsion despite apparent severe ischemia.

Laparoscopy is becoming more important in the early diagnosis and treatment of adnexal cyst torsion due to its advantages, such as its minimally invasive nature, reduced acute stress reaction, and facilitation of direct observation of intra-abdominal lesions.[37,38,39] However, if cancer of the ovary or fallopian tube is suspected, a laparotomy should be done.[40,41]

While performing the surgery, it is necessary to assess ovarian viability and preserve its function. The only way to determine the viability of a torsed ovary during surgery is by gross visual inspection. In the conventional point of view, dark and enlarged ovaries may have vascular and lymphatic congestion and may seem nonviable. However, multiple studies have suggested that even those black or blue-like ovaries may retain ovarian function following detorsion.[42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of the medical records and the surgical notes of 150 patients with surgically proven ovarian torsion over a 10-year period between January 2011 and January 2021 was conducted.

All patients above 14 years of age (those less than 14 years are seen by pediatric surgeons in our hospital) with surgically proven ovarian torsion were identified from the surgical records. Ovarian torsion is defined as partial or complete rotation of the ovarian vascular pedicle. All patients were presented to the emergency room at the King Hussein Medical Center.

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Royal Medical services. Demographic data which included age, marital status, parity, and menopausal status were noted.

Emergency department residents’ history, examination, and specialist notes were reviewed for clinical details such as presenting complaints, time from the onset of symptoms to presentation, time from presentation to surgery, leukocyte count, ultrasound findings, and color Doppler findings.

Surgical notes included details like the mode of surgery (laparotomy or laparoscopy), type of surgery (oophorectomy, detorsion, detorsion with cystectomy), whether fixation was done or not, time of surgery (day or night), seniority of the surgeon who did the surgery, size of mass/ovary, laterality, appearance of the torted ovary, color of the ovary, and number of twists.

Histopathologic reports of the patients who underwent oophorectomy or detorsion with cystectomy were also included in the study.

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) statistical software, version 21.1 (SPSS, Inc.). Patients’ general clinical characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 150 cases of surgically proven ovarian torsion over a 10-year period from January 2021 to January 2021 were included in the study. The demographic details are presented in Table 1. Our patients were aged between 14 and 55 years, and 133 (88.6%) of them were between 14 and 40 years of age. There were eight (5.3%) patients in the menopausal age group and 142 women (94.7%) in the reproductive age group. Out of 150 patients, 104 (69.4%) patients were unmarried and 58 (36.6%) patients were nulligravidas. Eight (5.3%) patients were pregnant; of these, five were in the first trimester and the other three were in the second trimester. Five (3.3%) patients had undergone ovarian stimulation during infertility treatments (two of them had undergone it as a part of in vitro fertilization).

Table 1.

Demographic details of the patients

Variable Frequency Percentage (%)
Age (years) 14-40 (133) 88.6
41-55 (17) 12.4
Marital status
 Married 46 30.6
 Not married 104 69.4
Pregnancy
 0 58 38.6
 1 40 26.7
 2 or more 52 34.7
Pregnant 8 5.3
Menopausal status
 Yes 8 5.3
 No 142 94.7
Risk factors
 Ovarian mass 123 82.0
 Ovarian stimulation 5 3.3
 PCOS 7 4.7
 Pregnancy 8 5.3
 Previous pelvic surgery 7 4.7

PCOS=polycystic ovarian syndrome

Time from the onset of symptoms to presentation was 1–36 h. All patients had acute onset of lower abdominal pain on one side of the abdomen (100%). All our patients had tenderness upon abdominal examination. This pain was described as colicky in nature, while 14 (9.3%) had intermittent pain over nearly 36 h. Also, 108 (72%) patients experienced nausea or vomiting. Low-grade fever was present in 18 (12.0%) patients. Time from the onset of symptoms to presentation was 1–36 h. Time from admission to surgery was 2–36 h, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Symptoms and signs

Variable Frequency Percentage (%)
Complaint of the patients
 Acute abdominal pain 150 100
 Nausea and vomiting 108 72
 Intermittent pain 14 9.3
 Fever 18 12.0
Tenderness 150 100
Time from the onset of symptoms to presentation 1-36 h
Leukocyte count >10,000 34 22.6

Basic laboratory investigations need to be performed to rule out other causes of acute abdominal or pelvic pain and include urine analysis, pregnancy tests, and full blood count.

Laboratory studies revealed a mild elevation of the white blood cell (WBC) count, and leukocytosis was found in only 34 (22.6.%) patients. Imaging is primarily achieved through either a transvaginal (in married patients) or a transabdominal approach. The most common sonographic sign was cyst with thickened walls and echogenic contents or a complex ovarian mass in 136 (90.6%) patients, while 14 (36%) patients had enlarged ovary with ovarian edema and peripherally arranged follicles. Free fluid was present in 54 (36%) patients. The most common sign is asymmetric ovarian enlargement to greater than 5 cm. Eighty-two (54.6%) patients had cysts or masses measuring between 5 and 10 cm, and 28 (18.6%) patients had masses or cysts measuring more than 12 cm. Obstruction to venous outflow can manifest in stromal edema and heterogeneous appearance of the ovary. Compromised arterial flow may be observable in abnormal Doppler tracings, although normal Doppler tracings do not exclude torsion, as abnormalities are only observed in about half of all cases. Doppler was documented in only 102 (68%) patients; Doppler flow was present in 34 (33.3%) patients and absent in 68 (67.7%) patients, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Ultrasound and Doppler findings of patients

Frequency Percentage (%)
Ultrasound findings
 Size of the cyst or mass (cm)
 <5 40 22.6%
 5-10 82 54.6%
 >10 28 18.6%
 Cyst with thickened walls and echogenic contents or complex mass 136 90.6%
 Enlarged edematous ovary and peripherally arranged follicles 14 9.4%
Free fluid 54 36%
Doppler flow
 Documented 102 68%
 Not documented 48 32%
 Present 34 33.3%
 Absent 68 67.7%

During the 10-year study period, 88 (58.7%) patients underwent laparotomy and 62 (41.2%) underwent laparoscopy. The operative findings during surgery were also recorded, which included size of the ovary or the mass, appearance of the torted ovary, laterality and the number of twists (not documented in all patients), and the type of surgery done. The size of the mass in adnexal torsion was 5 cm in 26 (17.3%) patients, 5–10 cm in 92 (61.3%) patients, and more than 10 cm in 32 (21.3%) patients. Right-sided torsion was seen in 92 (61.3%) cases and left-sided torsion in 58 (38.7%) cases.

Appearance of the torted ovaries was also reported at the time of surgery. The color of the torted ovary was dusky in 28 (18.6%) patients, brown to black in 46 (30.6%) patients, and blackish necrotic in 67 (50.7%) patients. Surgery for ovarian torsion was done within 2–36 h of admission.

During the 10-year study period, there was a shift from radical to conservative surgery, the latter being done more commonly in the last 5 years. Detorsion with cystectomy was done in 96 (64%) cases, detorsion alone in 14 (9.3%) cases, oophorectomy was done in 40 (26.6%) cases. Conservative surgery was performed based on surgeon’s discretion for the color of the ovary and return of circulation after detorsion. Oophoropexy was done in 22 (14.3%) cases, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Surgical details of the patients

Frequency Percentage (%)
Laparoscopy 62 41.2%
Laparotomy 88 58.7%
Time from admission to surgery 2-36 h
Time of surgery
 Day time 72 44%
 Night 78 56%
Seniority of the surgeon who did the surgery
 Consultant and senior specialist 58 38.7%
 Junior specialist 86 57.3%
 Senior resident 6 4.0%
Size of the ovary (cm)
 <5 26 17.3%
 5-10 92 61.3%
 >10 32 21.3%
Right 92 61.3%
Left 58 38.7%
Appearance of the torted ovary
 Dusky 28 18.6%
 Brown to black 46 30.6%
 Blackish, necrotic 76 50.7%
Number of twists
 Not documented 46 2-5
 Documented 104
Type of surgery
 Oophorectomy 40 26.6%
 Detorsion with cystectomy 96 64%
 Detorsion alone 14 9.3%
 Fixation 22 14.6%

Histopathologic examination was done for 136 specimens. Simple cyst was the most common pathology, followed by dermoid cyst and serous, mucinous cystadenoma.

Forty-six women (33.8%) had a dermoid cyst, 42 (30.8.2%) had simple cysts, and 12 (8.8%) each had mucinous and serous cystadenomas. We had two cases of serous cystadenocarcinoma; one of them was postmenopausal and the other patient presented with torsion, for whom detorsion alone was done, and she got pregnant and was lost to follow-up.

She presented 2 weeks after delivery with recurrent torsion. Detorsion with cystectomy was done and the histopathology showed cystadenocarcinoma as presented in Table 5.

Table 5.

Histopathology report

Frequency Percentage (%)
Dermoid 46 33.8
Functional cyst 42 30.8
Mucinous cyst adenoma 12 8.8
Serous cyst adenoma 12 8.8
Borderline tumors 2 1.5
Endometrioma 2 1.5
Hemorrhagic cyst 10 7.3
Serous adenocarcinoma 2 1.5
Granulosa cell tumor 2 1.5
Paratubal cyst 6 4.4

Discussion

Adnexal torsion occurs mostly in women of childbearing age, and adnexa removal on the affected side causes adverse effects. This study included 150 patients diagnosed with ovarian torsion surgically.

In our study, the majority of the women (88.6%) were of reproductive age, with age ranging between 14 and 40 years. The median age of women with ovarian torsion in the present study was 24 years, which is comparable to the median age in the study by Gupta et al.[50] and Tsafrir et al.[41] with range of age (29 ± 12)[41] and by Vijayalakshmi et al.[51] with the mean age of 39.7 years (mean 39.7, standard deviation [SD] 14.3).[51]

Out of total 150 patients, 58 women (36.6%) were nulliparous, 40 women were para 1 (26.7%), and 34 (33.7%) women were para 2 and more (44.4%). Our results corelate with the reports of Descargues et al.[52] and Gupta et al.;[50] 42% of their patients were nulliparous.[50,52]

Several longitudinal studies (retrospective reviews) of ovarian torsion in pregnancy estimated that 10%–25% of women with torsion are pregnant.[53,54] The main risk factors for OT in the first trimester are corpus luteum cysts and ovarian hyperstimulation. In our study, the incidence in pregnancy was 5.3% and is less than that reported by the previously mentioned studies.

Adnexal torsion is uncommon in postmenopausal women.[55] Eight (5.3%) of our patients were in the postmenopausal group; this is a little bit higher than that reported by Hibbard,[10] which was approximately 2.7%.

Spinelli et al.[9] presented a review of literature to discuss the management of ovarian torsion in children and adolescents. It was found that 76.7% cases were associated with underlying pathology, while in the remaining 23.3% cases, ovarian torsion was found with normal adnexa. In our study, 123 (76.7%) had ovarian mass and eight (4.7%) had polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).

The preoperative diagnosis of ovarian torsion is challenging because of the nonspecific clinical presentation. All patients in our study had abdominal pain; 150 (100%) patients presented with acute-onset abdominal pain, while 14 (9.4%) had intermittent pain until presentation to the emergency room. Also, 108 (72%) patients reported nausea and vomiting. Fever was documented in 12 (8.0%) patients. Time from onset of symptoms to presentation was 1–36 h. Upon abdominal examination, 150 (100%) had lower abdominal tenderness. This is consistent with a systematic review of clinical data among patients with surgically diagnosed ovarian torsion, which noted that 97.5% reported abdominal pain with associated nausea/emesis.[56] In another study done by Shadinger et al.,[57] in 2008, 39 cases of ovarian torsion were reviewed retrospectively. All patients presented with the chief symptom of abdominal pain (100%); 85% patients reported nausea and vomiting, while low-grade fever was seen in only 18% cases. Elevated WBCs was not a frequent finding in our study (found in only 34 [22.6%] patients), which was consistent with previous studies.[18,58]

Oltmann et al.[59] and Budhram et al.[60] reported that there is more likelihood of torsion when the size of the ovarian mass is 5 cm or larger. In our study, there were 110 (73.2%) cases having adnexal mass of size 5–10 cm, which had undergone torsion. This finding suggests a higher adnexal mass (>5 cm in size) as a risk factor for adnexal torsion. This is consistent with the report of Houry and Abbott.[4]

In our study, ultrasound (vaginal in married patients or abdominal in unmarried patients) was performed in all 150 (100%) patients and color Doppler was documented in 102 (68%) patients. The most common ultrasound finding in our study was enlarged ovary along with concomitant cyst showing thickened walls and echogenic contents due to hemorrhage and necrosis (136 [90.2%]). This is consistent with the finding of Servaes et al.,[25] who reported that the most common sonographic finding of OT was an enlarged and heterogeneous adnexal mass.

It was previously reported that despite the presence of ovarian torsion, Doppler ultrasonography[61,62] was normal in 60% of the cases because of the presence of a dual blood supply to the ovary; but this is contrary to our study which showed absent Doppler flow in 68 (67.3%) patients. Presence of Doppler flow does not exclude ovarian torsion as Doppler flow may be present in the early stage of torsion.

Similar to previous studies, ovarian torsion happened more frequently in the right ovary than the left ovary in our study also.[63] The fact that the hypermobility of the cecum and ileum on the right side compared to the proximity of the relatively fixed sigmoid colon is the proposed mechanism for this tendency.[64]

Laparotomy was the main approach to treatment of OT in the past. However, laparoscopy has now been popularized as a more reliable method of diagnosis and treatment of OT.[65] In our study, 88 (58.7%) patients underwent laparotomy and 62 (41.3%) patients underwent laparoscopy. In our study, the number of cases that underwent laparoscopy is less than that reported by Nair et al.,[5] where 81.7% of the torsion was treated by laparoscopy; this could be due to lack of experience by the junior doctors to do laparoscopy, as 86 (57.7%) and six (4.0%) of our cases were operated by junior specialists and senior residents, respectively. Also, 78 (56.0%) of our cases were operated at night when laparoscope may not be available and the staff on duty may not be experienced in laparoscopic surgery.

In our study, 96 (64%) patients underwent detorsion with cystectomy and 14 (9.3%) underwent detorsion alone. Performing a conservative surgery would have saved the ovarian function in these 110 patients (73.3%) patients. Ovarian salvage rate in this study was 73.3%. This is comparable to the ovarian salvage rates in adults reported in previous studies, which was 82% by Resapu et al.,[66] and is much more than that reported by Huang et al.[6] (35.8%).

Over the past years, oophorectomy was the standard treatment for adnexal torsion due to fear of thromboembolism.[67] Oophorectomy was done in 40 (26.6%) of our patients; eight of them were postmenopausal and in the remaining, surgeons claimed that they cannot preserve the ovaries.

Regarding pathological findings, the reported pathology in our study was benign in 146 cases (97%) and malignant in four cases (3.0%) (two cases of cystadenocarcinoma and two cases of granulosa cell tumors). White and Stella[68] and Rotoli[69] have reported in their case series about malignancy in 2% or lesser of cases of torsion.

The most common presentation in the current study was dermoid cyst (33.8%) and functional cysts (30.8%), whereas Balci et al.[70] reported dermoids (32.0%) and follicular cyst (14.6%) as the most common presentation.

The limitations of our study are that since it is a retrospective study, bias due to incomplete data might have crept in and the single-center design of the study. Only surgically proven cases of adnexal torsion were included, and we may have missed cases with the less-typical presentation of ovarian torsion who did not undergo surgery or cases with spontaneous detorsion of the ovary who were not classified as ovarian torsion. Patients with retorsion were not followed, and the reproductive potential of the retwisted ovary was not assessed.

Conclusion

Diagnosis of ovarian torsion is a difficult and challenging task which requires good clinical skills. High index of clinical suspicion is essential. Ultrasound with Doppler helps in diagnosing adnexal mass with torsion. Once ovarian torsion is suspected, surgery is the mainstay of diagnosis and treatment. Laparoscopy is not only useful for diagnosis, but also for treating torsion with less morbidity. Conservative surgery is preferred for patients in the reproductive age group.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Adnexal torsion in adolescents. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee opinion no 783. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134:e56–63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003373. doi:10.1097/aog. 0000000000003373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sokol E. Clinical anatomy of the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries. Global Library of Women's Medicine. 2011. doi:10.3843/GLOWM.10001. Muckle C. Clinical anatomy of the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries. Gynecol Obstet. 1977;27:1167–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beaunoyer M, Chapdelaine J, Bouchard S, Ouimet A. Asynchronous bilateral ovarian torsion. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:746–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Houry D, Abbott JT. Ovarian torsion:A fifteen-year review. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38:156–9. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nair S, Joy S, Nayar J. Five year retrospective case series of adnexal torsion. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:OC09–13. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9464.5251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang C, Hong MK, Ding DC. A review of ovary torsion. Tzu-chi Med J. 2017;29:143–7. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_55_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huchon C, Fauconnier A. Adnexal torsion:A literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hermans AJ, Kluivers KB, Wijnen MH, Bulten J, Massuger LF, Coppus SF. Diagnosis and treatment of adnexal masses in children and adolescents. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:611–5. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Spinelli C, Buti I, Pucci V, Liserre J, Alberti E, Nencini L, et al. Adnexal torsion in children and adolescents:New trends to conservative surgical approach—Our experience and review of literature. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:54–8. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.705377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hibbard LT. Adnexal torsion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;152:456–61. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80157-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hubner N, Langer JC, Kives S, Allen LM. Evolution in the management of pediatric and adolescent ovarian torsion as a result of quality improvement measures. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30:132–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gorkemli H, Camus M, Clasen K. Adnexal torsion after gonadotrophin ovulation induction for IVF or ICSI and its conservative treatment. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002;267:4–6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-001-0251-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Varras M, Tsikini A, Polyzos D, Samara C, Hadjopoulos G, Akrivis C. Uterine adnexal torsion:Pathologic and gray-scale ultrasonographic findings. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004;31:34–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Oelsner G, Shashar D. Adnexal torsion. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:459–63. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huchon C, Panel P, Kayem G, Schmitz T, Nguyen T, Fauconnier A. Does this woman have adnexal torsion? Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2359–64. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chang HC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiographics. 2008;28:1355–68. doi: 10.1148/rg.285075130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ashwal E, Krissi H, Hiersch L, Less S, Eitan R, Peled Y. Presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of ovarian torsion in premenarchal girls. J Pediat Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28:526–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.SC, Fischer A, Barber R, Huang R, Hicks B, Garcia N. Cannot exclude torsion —A 15-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1212–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Riccabona M, Lobo M-L, Ording-Muller L-S, Thomas Augdal A, Fred Avni E, Blickman J, et al. European Society of paediatric radiology abdominal imaging Task force recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part IX:Imaging in anorectal and cloacal malformation, imaging in childhood ovarian torsion, and efforts in standardising paediatric uroradiology terminology. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47:1369–80. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3837-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Damigos E, Johns J, Ross J. An update on the diagnosis and management of ovarian torsion. Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;14:229–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Anthony EY, Caserta MP, Singh J, Chen MY. Adnexal masses in female pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W426–31. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee EJ, Kwon HC, Joo HJ, Suh JH, Fleischer AC. Diagnosis of ovarian torsion with color doppler sonography:Depiction of twisted vascular pedicle. J Ultrasound Med. 1998;17:83–9. doi: 10.7863/jum.1998.17.2.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilkinson C, Sanderson A. Adnexal torsion-A multimodality imaging review. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:476–83. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Albayram F, Hamper UM. Ovarian and adnexal torsion:Spectrum of sonographic findings with pathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:1083–9. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.10.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Servaes S, Zurakowski D, Laufer MR, Feins N, Chow JS. Sonographic findings of ovarian torsion in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:446–51. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0429-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lourenco AP, Swenson D, Tubbs RJ, Lazarus E. Ovarian and tubal torsion:Imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21:179–187. doi: 10.1007/s10140-013-1163-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kokoska ER, Keller MS, Weber TR. Acute ovarian torsion in children. Am J Surg. 2000;180:462–5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00503-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qaseem A, Chou R, Humphrey L, Shekelle P. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:474–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xia Y, Lu QY, Lu YL, Dai J, Ding QL, Wang XF, et al. Molecular basis of type I antithrombin deficiency in two women with recurrent venous thromboembolism in the first trimester of pregnancy. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2012;48:254–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lidegaard Ø, Milsom I, Geirsson RT, Skjeldestad FE. Hormonal contraception and venous thromboembolism. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:769–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yan X, Xianling Z, Ting Y. Comparison of clinical features of ovarian cyst torsion in postmenopausal and childbearing age patients. Chinese J Women Children Health Res. 2016;27:1399–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Djavadian D, Braendle W, Jaenicke F. Laparoscopic oophoropexy for the treatment of recurrent torsion of the adnexa in pregnancy:Case report and review. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:933–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, Bar-On S, Almog B, Mashiach R, et al. Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:536.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Celik A, Ergun O, Aldemir H, Ozcan C, Ozok G, Erdener A, et al. Long-term results of conservative management of adnexal torsion in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:704–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pansky M, Smorgick N, Herman A, Schneider D, Halperin R. Torsion of normal adnexa in postmenarchal women and risk of recurrence. Obstet Gyneco. 2007;109:355–9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000250969.15438.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fuchs N, Smorgick N, Tovbin Y, Ben Ami I, Maymon R, Halperin R, et al. Oophoropexy to prevent adnexal torsion:How, when, and for whom? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:205–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Göçmen A, Karaca M, Sari A. Conservative laparoscopic approach to adnexal torsion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;277:535–8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0501-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Choi JW, Ahn SE, Rengaraj D, Seo HW, Lim W, Song G, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 3 is a stromal marker for chicken ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett. 2011;2:1047–51. doi: 10.3892/ol.2011.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shigetomi H, Oonogi A, Tsunemi T, Tanase Y, Yamada Y, Kajihara H, et al. The role of components of the chromatin modification machinery in carcinogenesis of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (Review) Oncol Lett. 2011;2:591–7. doi: 10.3892/ol.2011.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oelsner G, Cohen SB, Soriano D, Admon D, Mashiach S, Carp H, et al. Minimal surgery for the twisted ischaemic adnexa can preserve ovarian function. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2599–602. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tsafrir Z, Hasson J, Levin I, Solomon E, Lessing JB, Azem F, et al. Adnexal torsion:Cystectomy and ovarian fixation are equally important in preventing recurrence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162:203–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shalev J, Goldenberg M, Oelsner G, Ben-Rafael Z, Bider D, Blankstein J, et al. Treatment of twisted ischemic adnexa by simple detorsion. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mashiach S, Bider D, Moran O, Goldenberg M, Ben-Rafael Z. Adnexal torsion of hyperstimulated ovaries in pregnancies after gonadotropin therapy. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:76–80. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bider D, Mashiach S, Dulitzky M, Kokia E, Lipitz S, Ben-Rafael Z, et al. Clinical, surgical and pathologic findings of adnexal torsion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;173:363–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Oelsner G, Bider D, Goldenberg M, Admon D, Mashiach S. Long-term follow-up of the twisted ischemic adnexa managed by detorsion. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:976–9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56395-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dolgin SE, Lublin M, Shlasko E. Maximizing ovarian salvage when treating idiopathic adnexal torsion. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:624–6. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.0350624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Aziz D, Davis V, Allen L, Langer JC. Ovarian torsion in children:Is oophorectomy necessary? J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:750–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Harkins G. Ovarian torsion treated with untwisting:Second look 36 hours after untwisting. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:270. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang JH, Wu DH, Jin H, Wu YZ. Predominant etiology of adnexal torsion and ovarian outcome after detorsion in premenarchal girls. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2010;20:298–301. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gupta A, Gadipudi A, Nayak D. A five-year review of ovarian torsion cases:Lessons learnt. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020;70:220–4. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01319-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vijayalakshmi K, Reddy GM, Subbiah VN, Sathiya S, Arjun B. Clinico pathological profile of adnexal torsion cases. A retrospective analysis from a tertiary care hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:oc04–7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8167.4456. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2014/8167.4456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Descargues G, Tinlot-Mauger F, Gravier A. Adnexal torsion:A report on forty-five cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;98:91–6. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00555-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rackow BW, Patrizio P. Successful pregnancy complicated by early and late adnexal torsion after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:697.e9–12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tsafrir Z, Azem F, Hasson J, Solomon E, Almog B, Nagar H, et al. Risk factors, symptoms, and treatment of ovarian torsion in children:The twelve-year experience of one center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Koonings PP, Grimes DA. Adnexal torsion in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:11–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rey-Bellet Gasser C, Gehri M, Joseph JM, Pauchard JY. Is it ovarian torsion?A systematic literature review and evaluation of prediction signs. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016;32:256. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shadinger LL, Andreotti RF, Kurian RL. Preoperative sonographic and clinical characteristics as predictors of ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:7–13. doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kives S, Gascon S, Dubuc E, Van Eyk N. No. 341-diagnosis and management of adnexal torsion in children, adolescents, and adults. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Oltmann SC, Fischer A, Barber R, Huang R, Hicks B, Garcia N. Cannot exclude torsion--A 15-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1212–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Budhram G, Elia T, Dan J, Schroeder M, Safain G, Schlech W, et al. Acase-control study of sonographic maximum ovarian diameter as a predictor of ovarian torsion in emergency department females with pelvic pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26:152–9. doi: 10.1111/acem.13523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Stark JE, Siegel MJ. Ovarian torsion in prepubertal and pubertal girls:Sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:1479–82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.6.7992751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sasaki KJ, Miller CE. Adnexal torsion:Review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:196–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kayabasoglu F, Aydogdu S, Yilmaz SE, Sarica E. Torsion of the previously normal uterine adnexa in the second trimester of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282:655–8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1709-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Boyd CA, Riall TS. Unexpected gynecologic findings during abdominal surgery. Curr Probl Surg. 2012;49:195–251. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2011.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mayer JP, Bettolli M, Kolberg-Schwerdt A, Lempe M, Schlesinger F, Hayek I, et al. Laparoscopic approach to ovarian mass in children and adolescents:Already a standard in therapy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(Suppl 1):S111–5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0191.supp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Resapu P, Rao Gundabattula S, Bharathi Bayyarapu V, Pochiraju M, Surampudi K, Dasari S. Adnexal torsion in symptomatic women:A single-centre retrospective study of diagnosis and management. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39:349–54. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1494702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Huang C, Hong MK, Chu TY, Ding DC. Aretrospective study of surgical treatment and outcome among women with adnexal torsion in eastern Taiwan from 2010 to 2015. Peer J. 2018;6:e5995. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5995. doi:10.7717/peerj. 5995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.White M, Stella J. Ovarian torsion:10-year perspective. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:231–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00728.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rotoli JM. Abdominal pain in the post-menopausal female:Is ovarian torsion in the diferential? J Emerg Med. 2017;52:749–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Balci O, Icen MS, Mahmoud AS, Capar M, Colakoglu MC. Management and outcomes of adnexal torsion:A 5-year experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:643–6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1702-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES