Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;10(4):296–305. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0060

Table 1.

Gender-Sexuality Alliance Student and Advisor Characteristics at Wave 1

  n (%) Mean (SD) Range
Students (n = 366)
 Gender identity
  Cisgender male 59 (16.1)
  Cisgender female 202 (55.2)
  Transgender 31 (8.5)
  Genderqueer 8 (2.2)
  Gender fluid 7 (1.9)
  Nonbinary 22 (6)
  Other 36 (9.8)
  Missing 1 (0.3)
 Sexual identity
  Gay or lesbian 61 (16.7)
  Bisexual 81 (22.1)
  Questioning 26 (7.1)
  Heterosexual or straight 52 (14.2)
  Pansexual 79 (21.6)
  Asexual 14 (3.8)
  Queer 18 (4.9)
  Other 32 (8.7)
  Missing 3 (0.8)
 Race and ethnicity
  Non-Latinx White 264 (72.1)
  Non-Latinx Black or African American 8 (2.2)
  Non-Latinx Asian 10 (2.7)
  Latinx 39 (10.7)
  Non-Latinx Middle Eastern, Arab or Arab American 1 (0.3)
  Biracial or multiracial 40 (10.9)
  Missing 4 (1.1)
 Age
  Wave 1 (n missing = 3) 15.5 (1.4) 10 to 20
 CES-D 10 Score
  Wave 1 (n missing = 9) 14.1 (6.8) 0 to 30
  Wave 2 (n missing = 15) 13.9 (6.7) 0 to 30
  Change score 0.3 (5.7) −19 to 21
Advisors (n = 52)
 Self-efficacy to address transgender issues 20.4 (3.0) 13 to 25
 Number of hours spent on GSA-related work per week 2.8 (2.1) 0.75 to 13.5
 Number of months serving as GSA advisor 61.5 (67.0) 2 to 302
 GSA specific training 21 (55.3)

Higher change scores represent an increase in depressive symptoms from wave 1 to wave 2.

CES-D 10, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression 10; GSA, Gender-Sexuality Alliance; SD, standard deviation.