Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2023 Jun 12;3(6):e0002012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002012

Multiple electrolyte derangements among perioperative women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study

Ritah Nantale 1,2,*,#, David Mukunya 2,3,4,#, Kenneth Mugabe 2,5, Julius N Wandabwa 2,5, John Stephen Obbo 2,6, Milton W Musaba 2,5
Editor: Julia Robinson7
PMCID: PMC10259772  PMID: 37307269

Abstract

There is a dearth of information on the patterns of electrolyte derangements among perioperative women with obstructed labour. We measured the levels and patterns of electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda. This was a secondary analysis of data for 389 patients with obstructed labour, diagnosed by either an obstetrician or medical officer on duty between July 2018 and June 2019. Five milliliters of venous blood was drawn from the antecubital fossa under an aseptic procedure for electrolytes and complete blood analyses. The primary outcome was the prevalence of electrolyte derangements, defined as values outside the normal ranges: Potassium 3.3–5.1 mmol/L, Sodium 130–148 mmol/L, Chloride 97–109 mmol/L, Magnesium 0.55–1.10 mmol/L, Calcium (Total) 2.05–2.42 mmol/L, and Bicarbonate 20–24 mmol/L. The most prevalent electrolyte derangement was hypobicarbonatemia [85.8% (334/389)], followed by hypocalcaemia [29.1% (113/389)], then hyponatremia [18% (70/389)]. Hyperchloraemia [4.1% (16/389)], hyperbicarbonatemia [3.1% (12/389)], hypercalcaemia [2.8% (11/389)] and hypermagnesemia [2.8% (11/389)] were seen in a minority of the study participants. A total of 209/389 (53.7%) of the participants had multiple electrolyte derangements. Women who used herbal medicines had 1.6 times the odds of having multiple electrolyte derangements as those who did not use herbal medicines [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 1.6; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): (1.0–2.5)]. Having multiple electrolyte derangements was associated with perinatal death although this estimate was not precise [AOR 2.1; 95% CI: (0.9–4.7)]. Women with obstructed labour in the perioperative period have multiple electrolyte derangements. Use of herbal medicines in labour was associated with having multiple electrolyte derangements. We recommend routine assessment of electrolytes prior to surgery in patients with obstructed labour.

Introduction

Obstructed labour is associated with life-threatening electrolyte derangements because of the protracted nature of the labour process that is characterized by long periods of inadequate oral intake [1], and anaerobic metabolism of glucose [2].

The associated maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality is dependent on the nature of the imbalance in a specific electrolyte. For instance, an imbalance in maternal potassium levels is a known cause of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and cardiac arrest [2]. While imbalances in sodium especially hyponatremia during labour could result in cerebral edema which manifests as irritability, headache, nausea, vomiting, convulsions and coma that can easily be confused with preeclampsia and eclampsia [3,4]. In the postoperative period, electrolyte imbalances are a known cause of paralytic ileus especially after an emergency cesarean section [5]. Ileus is associated with post-cesarean maternal and perinatal morbidity because it interferes with early ambulation and oral intake, and consequently the initiation of breastfeeding [6]. Since the placenta is permeable to most of these ions either freely or through ion exchange mechanisms, the fetus is not spared from the effects of maternal electrolyte imbalance, which mirror those of the mother [7]. For instance, maternal hyponatremia is associated with an increased incidence of respiratory distress, hyperbilirubinemia, and neonatal convulsions in the postnatal period [3].

Moen et al. reported a 26% prevalence of hyponatremia among 287 patients labouring normally, in a Swedish hospital [3]. Among patients with obstructed labour, the prevalence of electrolyte imbalance is poorly studied [8,9]. In obstructed labour, serum bicarbonate is depleted in an attempt to buffer the excess acid (H+ ions) produced as a by-product of anaerobic metabolism of glucose to produce energy in form of ATP for the contracting myometrium [1012]. While the accumulation of potassium ions in the extracellular space (serum hyperkalaemia) arises from the exchange of intra-cellular K+ ions for H+ ions across the cell membrane to restore homeostasis [12,13]. In addition, obstructed labour in our setting is often preceded by a prolonged episode of labouring, restricted oral intake, inadequate intravenous fluid replacement by the providers, and at times consumption of local herbs that result in hypoglycaemia, dehydration, and hypernatremia [8,14].

Most patients with obstructed labour require surgical intervention to relieve the obstruction. Electrolyte imbalances are associated with poor surgical outcomes [15]. Intravenous fluid replacement is an important component of preoperative preparation to correct the associated dehydration and electrolyte imbalance [16]. Preoperative electrolyte measurement is not done routinely because of limited access to laboratory services and yet emergency cesarean section is the most common major surgical procedure performed on a daily basis. There is a dearth of information on the peri-operative patterns of electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labour. We aimed to describe levels and patterns of electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labour at Mbale regional referral hospital in eastern Uganda.

Materials and methods

Study setting and design

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among pregnant women screened for inclusion into a clinical trial at Mbale regional referral hospital in eastern Uganda. The rationale and design of this trial have been described elsewhere [17]. From July 2018 to June 2019, all patients diagnosed with obstructed labour (incident cases) were consecutively screened for inclusion in an ongoing trial that has since been published elsewhere [18]. Midwives in the delivery suite informed the study team of all participants diagnosed with obstructed labour [17]. Two research assistants (RA) were available throughout the day and night to recruit all eligible women. As per the Ugandan clinical guidelines, the standard preoperative care for all patients diagnosed with obstructed labour includes prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics, at least 1.5 L of intravenous fluids, bladder emptying, administration of oxygen, and lying in a left-lateral position [19]. All these interventions were done after obtaining blood samples for electrolyte and haematological assessment.

Study population

These were patients diagnosed with obstructed labour by either an Obstetrician or Medical Officer on duty using a definition of the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG). In the first stage of labour, she should have cervical dilatation >6 cm with ruptured membranes, adequate contractions lasting >4 hours with no change in cervical dilatation or delay in the second active stage of labour (nullipara >2 hours, multipara >1 hour) with adequate uterine contractions. In addition, any two of the obvious signs of severe obstruction such as caput formation, severe moulding, Bandl’s ring, subconjunctival haemorrhages, or an oedematous vulva [20].

Sample size and sampling

We used the formula for determining sample size for frequency (single proportion) in a population as described in Open Epi, Version 3, open-source calculator [21]. We made the following assumptions; a confidence level of 95%, the proportion of the (prevalence of electrolyte derangements) in the population to be 50% since we could not find a similar published study, a design effect (DEFF) of 1, and power of 95%. It was estimated that a minimum sample of 384 participants would be sufficient but included all 389 women with obstructed labour who had been recruited after 12 months of data collection. We consecutively recruited all eligible incident patients diagnosed with obstructed labour until the calculated sample was attained.

Eligibility criteria

We included all eligible patients with obstructed labour carrying singleton, term pregnancies (≥37 gestation age) in cephalic presentation. Whereas those diagnosed with other obstetric emergencies such as (antepartum haemorrhage, Pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia (defined as elevated blood pressure of at least 140/90 mmHg, urine protein of at least 2+, any of the danger signs and fits), premature rupture of membranes and intrauterine foetal death were excluded from this study. We also excluded all those with medical comorbidities such as diabetes, sickle cell, renal and liver diseases. Details are included in the published study protocol for the parent trial [17].

Study variables

The dependent variable was the prevalence of electrolyte derangements defined as values outside the normal ranges at the end of the third trimester of pregnancy, categorized as either hypo for below or hyper for above and measured using standard laboratory methods. We adopted pregnancy-specific ranges from Abbasi et al [22] and converted these to the international system of units (SI) using an online converter [23]. For Potassium 3.3–5.1 mmol/L, Sodium 130–148 mmol/L, Chloride 97–109 mmol/L, Magnesium 0.55–1.10 mmol/L, Calcium (Total) 2.05–2.42 mmol/L, and Bicarbonate 20–24 mmol/L. Multiple electrolyte derangements was defined as having two or more electrolyte derangements. We considered two or more electrolyte derangements since more than half of our sample were in this category. Perinatal death was defined as a fresh still birth or an early neonatal death at 7 days postnatal.

Other variables of interest were duration of labour in hours as reported by the patient, age in years, and physical characteristics such as weight, respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, foetal heart rate, and height.

Study procedures

All the staff in the labour ward at Mbale regional referral hospital were sensitized about the ongoing study. The staff participated in giving information to patients about the study at the time of admission. At least two research assistants were available day and night to recruit all eligible patients diagnosed with obstructed labour by the attending Obstetrician or Medical Officer on duty. Written informed consent was obtained from each of the eligible patients by a trained research assistant before administering the questionnaire and collecting blood samples. Enrollment into the study was done as soon as obstructed labour was diagnosed before childbirth.

Data collection

All the interviews were done in the participant’s local dialect by trained research assistants, using an electronic interviewer-administered questionnaire running on an open data kit (ODK) platform 19. On a daily basis, the principal investigator (PI) would access and review the data from the aggregate server for completeness.

Blood sample collection quality control

Qualified and well-trained midwives working in the labour suite drew five millilitres (ml) of blood from each participant using a five millilitres syringe. After removing the epidermal needle and the tops of the vacutainers, two millilitres were emptied into a purple top vacutainer for a full blood count, blood grouping and cross-matching as part of the standard preoperative preparation for all patients with obstructed labour in the hospital. The remaining three millilitres were emptied into a red top vacutainer for blood chemistries including electrolytes, these are not part of the routine preoperative preparation for patients before caesarean section. Each blood sample was transported to the laboratory in an ice-cooled container within 30 minutes of collection. We monitored strict adherence to the standard operating procedures for collecting and handling participant samples through ongoing training and spot checks. We used MBN clinical laboratories that are accredited and certified both locally and internationally. They are involved in routine (monthly) internal and external quality control checks.

Measurement of electrolytes

Serum electrolytes were measured using COBAS INTEGRA 400, which uses Ion Selective Electrodes (ISE) module. The ISE is an electro-mechanical device used to determine ionic concentrations in undiluted serum using electrons selective to different ions.

Data management

The electronic questionnaire was coded with checks and skips for internal consistency. The data was uploaded to a password-protected aggregate server to which only the Principal Investigator had access. After the study, a soft copy of all the laboratory tests was obtained from MBN clinical laboratories as an excel spreadsheet. The Principal Investigator was assisted by a statistician to download data from the aggregate server into excel spreadsheets and merge the two data sets. The data was then exported to Stata version 14.0 for further cleaning and analysis.

Data analysis

We summarised baseline continuous variables using either means and standard deviations (SD) or medians and interquartile range (IQR). Whereas frequencies and percentages were used for the categorical variables. We used simple proportions to compute the prevalence of each electrolyte imbalance as a percentage with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. Logistic regression to determine factors associated with multiple electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labour was done. Factors with a p-value less than 0.05 at multivariable analysis were considered to be statistically significant.

Ethics approval and informed consent

This study was approved by the Makerere University School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (#REC REF 2017–103) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS217ES) approved the protocol. Administrative clearance was obtained from the Mbale regional referral hospital research and Ethics Committee (MRRH-REC IN-COM 00/2018). A written informed consent was obtained from each of the participants before enrolment. Pregnant adolescents below the legal age for consent of 18 years in Uganda were treated as emancipated minors who could give valid informed consent as per the national guidelines 25. A copy of laboratory results was availed in the patients’ case file to aid the attending physicians in clinical decision-making regarding patient care.

Results

We screened 451 women and enrolled 420 women diagnosed with obstructed labour. Fifteen declined consent, seven had a ruptured uterus and nine had concurrent medical comorbidities and other obstetric emergencies.

Baseline characteristics of the study participants

Participants had a mean (standard deviation) age of 24.0 (6.2) years, majority 81.5% (317) were married. The patients generally had an elevated median capillary blood lactate level of 6.2 (3.3–13.5) mmol/L, a normal blood haemoglobin level 12.4 (1.9) and a high anion gap of 19 (13.4–23.5) mmol/L. They had a low median (interquartile range (IQR)) blood bicarbonate level of 13.2 (8.8–17.4) with a median duration of labour of 28 hours (18–43). About two-thirds (249/389) of respondents were admitted as referrals with obstructed labour and more than half (220/389) had used herbal medications during this labour. Almost all (90%) participants had a normal respiratory rate (16 to 24 breaths per minute). The details are in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics of the study participants.

Variable N = 389
Mean (SD) / Frequency (%)
Maternal age, years 24.0 (6.2)
≤19 110 (28.3)
20–35 253 (65.0)
>35 26 (6.7)
Marital status
Single 72 (18.5)
Married 317 (81.5)
Maternal level of education
None 9 (2.3)
Primary 185 (47.6)
Secondary 165 (42.4)
Tertiary 30 (7.7)
Religion
Christian 263 (67.6)
Muslim 122 (31.4)
Others 4 (1.0)
Maternal occupation
Salaried employee 41 (10.5)
Business 36 (9.3)
Subsistence farmer 61 (15.7)
House wife 195 (50.1)
Other 56 (14.4)
Place of residence
Urban 41 (10.5)
Rural 348 (89.5)
Alcohol drinking
Yes 12 (3.1)
No 377 (89.9)
HIV status
Positive 6 (1.5)
Negative 375 (96.4)
Don’t know 8 (2.1)
Parity
Primigravida 210 (54.0)
2 to 4 125 (32.1)
5+ 54 (13.9)
Labour duration (in hours) 28.2 (18.2–42.8)
<12 34 (8.7)
12 to 18 63 (16.2)
>18 292 (75.1)
Maternal height, cm 159.2 (8.3)
Maternal weight, kg 64.8 (12.0)
Maternal pulse rate, bpm 85 (18.7)
Maternal systolic blood pressure, mmHg 122.4 (14.0)
Maternal diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 75.3 (11.93)
Maternal respiratory rate, bpm [median, IQR] 19.0 (18.0–22.0)
Maternal haemoglobin level, mg/dl 12.4 (1.89)
Maternal lactate, mmol/L 6.2 (3.3–13.5)
Gestation age, completed weeks 38 (38–40)
Mean fetal heart rate, bpm 137.9 (14.0)
Anion gap* 19 (13.4–23.5)
Ketones on urine dipstick
Negative 214 (55.0)
One plus 7 (1.8)
Two plus 53 (13.6)
Three plus 71 (18.3)
More than three plus 44 (11.3)
Referred
Yes 249 (64.0)
No 140 (36.0)
Used herbal medicines
Yes 220 (57.6)
No 169 (43.4)

Abbreviations; bpm- beats per minute.

Levels and patterns of electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda

Less than 5% (18/389) of the participants didn’t have any electrolyte derangement, 47.7% (162/389) had one electrolyte derangement and 53.7% (209/389) had two or more electrolyte derangements (multiple electrolyte derangements). The most prevalent electrolyte derangement was hypobicarbonatemia [85.8% (334/389)] followed by hypocalcaemia [29.1% (113/389)]. Hyperbicarbonatemia [3.1% (12/389)], hypercalcaemia [2.8% (11/389)], and hypermagnesemia [2.8% (11/389)] were seen in a minority of the study participants.

Electrolyte derangements in the hypo (low) category were more pronounced than those in the hyper (high) category. The details are in Table 2.

Table 2. Levels and patterns of electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda.

Electrolyte Imbalance Prevalence (N = 389) mmol/L
n (%) 95% CI Median (IQR) Q1—Q3
Sodium   133.9 (4.9) 131.2–136.1
Hyponatremia 70 (18.0) 14.5–22.5 127.3 (5.8) 123.2–129
Normal 319 (82.0) 77.8–85.5 132.6 (4.3) 132.6–136.9
Hypernatremia 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Potassium   3.8 (0.7) 3.8–4.21
Hypokalaemia 47 (12.1) 9.6–16.3 3.2 (0.2) 3–3.23
Normal 313 (80.4) 75.7–83.6 3.9 (0.6) 3.6–4.2
Hyperkalaemia 29 (7.5) 5.2–10.5 5.6 (0.4) 5.4–5.8
Calcium   2.14 (0.2) 2.03–2.23
Hypocalcaemia 113 (29.1) 26.8–35.8 1.98 (0.1) 1.89–2.02
Normal 255 (65.6) 60.7–70.1 2.2 (0.1) 2.13–2.25
Hypercalcemia 11 (2.8) 2.3–6.3 2.45 (0.1) 2.42–2.53
Magnesium   0.71 (0.1) 0.64–0.78
Hypomagnesemia 23 (5.9) 4.0–8.8 0.44 (0.2) 0.34–0.52
Normal 355 (91.3) 88–93.7 0.71 (0.1) 0.65–0.78
Hypermagnesemia 11 (2.8) 1.6–5.0 1.25 (0.5) 1.13–1.62
Chloride   101.8 (5.3) 98.8–104.1
Hypochloraemia 53 (13.6) 10.5–17.4 95.3 (3.4) 92.6–96.1
Normal 320 (82.3) 82–89 102.2 (4.3) 99.9–104
Hyperchloremia 16 (4.1) 2.5–6.6 111.1 (2.4) 109.9–112.3
Bicarbonate   13.2 (8.6) 8.8–17.4
Hypobicarbonatemia 334 (85.9) 82–89 12.1 (7.4) 8.4–15.8
Normal 12 (3.1) 1.8–5.4 21.3 (1.7) 20.4–22.1
  Hyperbicarbonatemia 43 (11.1) 8.3–14.6 26 (1.7) 25.1–26.3

Abbreviations: Q1- lower quartile; Q3- upper quartile; CI- confidence interval; IQR- Interquartile range.

Electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labour, with the breakdown of (Fig 1) electrolytes by category (normal, high, low) for subgroups and (Fig 2) co-occurrence of electrolyte derangements. Fig 1 shows a ternary plot with balance of normal, high, and low levels for each of six serum electrolytes (bicarbonate, chloride, potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium), The six categories show the percent breakdown for each electrolyte group and the clustering of points in the upper left of the triangle indicates that most electrolytes were normal. Low electrolyte levels were observed most commonly, and elevated electrolyte levels were least common. Fig 2 shows electrolyte derangements and their co-occurrence. Horizontal bars (set size) show the prevalence of specific individual electrolyte derangement, while vertical bars (intersection size) show the co-occurrence. Overall, hypobicarbonatemia was the most common electrolyte derangement, followed by hypocalcemia, hyponatremia and hypochloraemia. hypercalcaemia, hypermagnesemia and hypernatremia were the least common electrolyte derangements overall. The most common presentation of derangements was hypobicarbonatemia alone (first vertical bar) [138 (35.5%)], followed by hypocalcaemia and hypobicarbonatemia (second vertical bar) [42 (10.8%)] then hypobicarbonatemia and hyponatremia (third vertical bar) [20 (5.1%)].

Fig 1. Ternary plot with balance of normal, high, and low levels for each of six serum electrolytes (bicarbonate, chloride, potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium).

Fig 1

Fig 2. Electrolyte derangements and their co-occurrence.

Fig 2

Obstetric outcomes of women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda

A total of 41 out of 383 (10.7%) babies died (these were fresh still births or early neonatal deaths), 14/383 (3.7%) were sick and admitted to the neonatal unit and 328/383 (85.6%) didn’t require any further treatment or attention. Having multiple electrolyte derangements [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 2.1; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): (0.9–4.7); P-value: 0.072] was associated with perinatal death although this estimate was not precise (S5 Table).

Amongst the mothers, 1/371 (0.3%) died, 8/379 (2.1%) suffered a morbidity and 370/379 (97.6%) didn’t require any further treatment or attention.

Factors associated with multiple electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda

Herbal medicine use in labour was associated with having multiple electrolyte derangements. Women who used herbal medicines had 1.6 times the odds of having multiple electrolyte derangements compared to those who didn’t use herbal medicines [AOR: 1.6; 95% CI: (1.0–2.5); P-value: 0.034]. Details are in Table 3.

Table 3. Factors associated with multiple electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.
Variable Multiple electrolyte derangements
N (%)
COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P-value
Maternal age
≤19 55 (26.3) 1
20 to 35 139 (66.5) 1.2 (0.8–1.9) 0.386 1.5 (0.9–2.4) 0.154
>35 15 (7.2) 1.4 (0.6–3.2) 0.481 1.3 (0.4–3.7) 0.649
Parity
Primigravida 116 (55.5) 1
2 to 4 60 (28.7) 0.7 (0.5–1.2) 0.200 0.7 (0.4–1.1) 0.110
5+ 33 (15.8) 1.3 (0.7–2.3) 0.438 1.2 (0.5–2.5) 0.705
Marital status
Single 38 (18.2) 1
Married 171 (81.8) 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 0.858 0.9 (0.5–1.5) 0.678
Religion
Christian 135 (64.6) 1
Muslim 72 (34.4) 1.4 (0.9–2.1) 0.160 1.4 (0.9–2.2) 0.178
Others 2 (1.0) 0.9 (0.1–6.8) 0.958 1.1 (0.1–8.2) 0.961
Alcohol drinking
Yes 4 (1.9) 1
No 205 (98.1) 2.4 (0.7–8.1) 0.162 2.3 (0.6–8.1) 0.200
HIV status
Positive 2 (1.0) 0.5 (0.1–4.5) 0.535 0.6 (0.1–6.2) 0.670
Negative 203 (97.1) 1.2 (0.3–4.8) 0.817 1.4 (0.3–5.9) 0.655
Don’t know 4 (1.9) 1
Referred from a lower health facility
No 77 (36.8) 1
Yes 132 (63.2) 0.9 (0.6–1.4) 0.706 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.432
Herbal medicines use in labour
Yes 127 (60.8) 1.4 (0.9–2.2) 0.071 1.6 (1.0–2.5) 0.034
No 82 (39.2) 1
Labour duration
<12 16 (7.7) 1
12 to 18 37 (17.7) 1.6 (0.7–3.7) 0.272 1.8 (0.7–4.3) 0.191
>18 156 (74.6) 1.3 (0.6–2.6) 0.482 1.3 (0.6–2.7) 0.521

COR: Crude Odds Ratio; AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; Bold: Statistically significant at a p-value<0.05.

Discussion

A secondary analysis was done using a cross sectional study design to determine the levels and patterns of electrolyte derangements among women with obstructed labour in the perioperative period at Mbale regional referral hospital. More participants had hypo (low) as opposed to hyper (high) electrolyte derangements, with over 50% of the participants having multiple electrolyte derangements. This finding is in line with what was reported by Chebet et al among women with obstructed labour in Mulago National Referral hospital, more women had hypo (low) as opposed to hyper (high) electrolyte derangements [9].

Hypobicarbonatemia was the most prevalent electrolyte disorder, more than three quarters (¾) of the participants had a low median blood bicarbonate level of 12 mmol/L. This finding is not surprising because during labour, anaerobic breakdown of glucose to produce ATP leads to the accumulation of lactic acid which disintegrates to produce excess hydrogen ions that are mopped up by the bicarbonate buffer because it is one of the two important body buffer systems [24]. Although, our study had no comparison group of women who laboured without obstruction, the findings are similar with those reported from Nigeria. Ekanem et al [8] compared electrolyte imbalances among women with normal labour and those with prolonged labour and reported a mean bicarbonate level of 23.8 mmol/L among women with normal labour compared to 17.6 mmol/L among women with prolonged labour, all of which are higher than the 12 mmol/L finding in the current study. This difference could be partly explained by the fact that two thirds of the participants in our study were admitted as referrals with obstructed labour, which represents a more extreme category of patients with prolonged neglected obstructed labour. This category of patients is known to be more acidotic and consequently have a much lower blood bicarbonate levels [18]. This information is of clinical importance because prolonged uncorrected metabolic acidosis is known to cause low foetal pH, low Apgar scores and asphyxia in the newborn [25]. In the mother, acidosis impairs uterine contractility and this could increase the risk of primary postpartum haemorrhage due to uterine atony [1012].

Hyponatremia was the only water balance disorder identified in this study. Lassey et al. reported hyponatremia in a case series of two parturient’s secondary to prolonged labour and excessive oral hypotonic fluid consumption at home [26]. They suggested a likely mechanism of hyponatraemia to be endogenous oxytocin and excessive free water consumption in a setting of hypovolemia. In this study, we could not accurately ascertain the amount of fluid consumed during labour, the duration of labour and whether or not the patients had been vomiting because we recruited them after a diagnosis of obstructed labour had been made. Generally, the study participants were normotensive with a mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 122 and 75 mmHg respectively.

On the contrary, we expected hypernatremia to be the most common electrolyte disorder in this setting since obstruction is preceded by a period of prolonged labouring characterised by restricted intake of fluids and solids both orally and intravenously. These practices predispose labouring women to dehydration and electrolyte imbalances especially hypernatremia as well as hypoglycaemia [1]. Much as our finding of hyponatremia is consistent with findings from elsewhere [3,26], it cannot be fully explained by dilution alone due to excessive fluid intake/replacement during labour that is not a common practice in this setting. An alternative explanation might be the activation of specific V2 vasopressin receptors in the kidney. During labour, the stimuli for vasopressin release such as hypoosmolality, pain, fear and stress are abundant and they may be pronounced in obstructed labour [3]. It is possible that these stimuli combine to mimic the syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion because of the similarity in structure between oxytocin and vasopressin [3]. Although labour its self is not a known cause of inappropriate ADH secretion. A study by Chebet et al., 2022 in Uganda also found out that hyponatraemia is prevalent among women with obstructed labour [9]. Hyponatraemia needs to be corrected because it is associated with several maternal and neonatal risks that may be life threatening [26].

About one third of our participants had hypocalcaemia (total calcium). We did not find any published papers from a similar setting for direct comparisons. However, this prevalence is high and it may not solely be attributable to nutritional deficiencies and none supplementation during pregnancy [27]. Ionised calcium plays a central role in the excitation, contraction and coupling mechanisms in the myometrium [12,14]. Since obstructed labour is characterised by strong and regular contractions, probably the demand for ionised calcium is high and this could result in hypocalcaemia. Our results have to be interpreted cautiously because we measured the total and not the ionised calcium that is required for uterine muscle contraction. Hypocalcaemia in labour could be attributed to labouring polypnea [28]. However, in our study almost all (90%) participants had a normal respiratory rate. The association between hypocalcaemia and obstructed labour needs further study by comparing with controls that experience normal labour.

Hypokalaemia was the most prevalent disorder of serum potassium, this was lower than the 20% prevalence reported among hospitalised patients, despite the fact that we adopted a wider normal range for the serum potassium levels (3.3 to 5.1 mmol/L) [24]. In line with our findings, a study by Chebet et al., 2022 also reported hypokalaemia to have been the most prevalent disorder of serum potassium in women with obstructed labour [9]. This is probably as a result of an intracellular shift in exchange for the excessive hydrogen ions generated from the lactic acid produced in obstructed labour. In this study, the prevalence of hyperkalaemia was slightly higher than what was reported in the study by Ekanem et al in Nigeria [8]. Derangements in potassium, especially hyperkalaemia is associated with life threatening arrythmia. Perioperatively, this is important information for clinicians to know because these patients will need anaesthesia before surgical intervention to relieve the obstruction.

Herbal medicine use in labour was associated with having multiple electrolyte derangements. Similarly, a study by Chebet et al., 2022 found an association between electrolyte imbalances and herbal medicine use in this same population [9]. Herbal medicines are of unknown safety, concentrations and efficacy levels and may cause kidney injury resulting from the toxicity imparted by the untested drugs thus leading to electrolyte imbalances [29]. Chebet et al., 2022 also reveals that herbal medicine use involves excessive intake of water, often with limited intake of salt and solutes which potentially limits the capacity of the kidney to excrete water leading to an electrolyte imbalance [9].

Water and electrolyte balance are affected by a number of factors that were not assessed in this study because the participants were only recruited after a diagnosis of obstructed labour had been confirmed. We could not accurately ascertain the amount, volume and type fluid used since the onset of labour. The inability to measure these factors; amount, volume and type fluid used since the onset of labour could have introduced a non-differential misclassified bias in our study. Additionally, majority of them were admitted as referrals with obstructed labour without proper documentation. Our assessment of the duration of labour and consumption of local herbs is based on patient reports which may not be accurate. Furthermore, we didn’t establish the exact types of herbal medicines used by the participants.

Methodological considerations;

This study was adequately powered to study the various electrolyte derangements and it is probably among the first in this population of patients from the same setting. However, this study had some limitations. The lack of a comparison group of women who laboured successfully without obstruction makes it difficult to attribute these electrolyte derangements to obstructed labour. However, a previous study from Nigeria reported differences in electrolyte derangements among those with and without obstructed labour. Nonetheless, the results of this study can be generalised to other regional referral hospitals within Uganda and other similar settings in sub-Saharan Africa.

Conclusion

Women with obstructed labour in the perioperative period have multiple electrolyte derangements, especially if they have used herbal medicines in labour. The derangements were more pronounced in the hypo (low) compared to the hyper (high) category. Clinicians need to know that life threatening electrolyte derangements are common among women with obstructed labour in the perioperative period.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Factors associated with hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Factors associated with hyponatremia among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Factors associated with hypobicarbonatemia among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Factors associated with hypocalcaemia among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Factors associated with perinatal death among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

(DOCX)

S1 Data. Stata dataset that includes all variables analysed for this manuscript.

(DTA)

Acknowledgments

We thank the study participants for accepting to be part of the study and the research midwives for working tirelessly to accomplish this task on time namely; Ms. Auma Prosscovia, Ms. Nandutu Sarah Waterah, Mrs. Atim Ketty Ojwar, Ms. Alibo Elizabeth, Ms. Sarah Talyewoya and Ms. Jessica Muduwa.

Data Availability

The dataset used for this analysis have been uploaded as supplementary information.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Dawood F, Dowswell T, Quenby S. Intravenous fluids for reducing the duration of labour in low risk nulliparous women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;(6). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007715.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walch A, Duke M, Auty T, Wong A. Profound Hypokalaemia Resulting in Maternal Cardiac Arrest: A Catastrophic Complication of Hyperemesis Gravidarum? Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology. 2018;2018:4687587. Epub 2018/08/29. doi: 10.1155/2018/4687587 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6087565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moen V, Brudin L, Rundgren M, Irestedt L. Hyponatremia complicating labour—rare or unrecognised? A prospective observational study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009;116(4):552–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02063.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reynolds RM, Padfield PL, Seckl JR. Disorders of sodium balance. Bmj. 2006;332(7543):702–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7543.702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weledji EP. Perspectives on paralytic ileus. Acute Medicine & Surgery. 2020;7(1):e573. doi: 10.1002/ams2.573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wilson A. Does chewing gum promote bowel function after cesarean section? AJN The American Journal of Nursing. 2017;117(7):21. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000520940.23976.94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sha X-Y, Xiong Z-F, Liu H-S, Di X-D, Ma T-H. Maternal-fetal fluid balance and aquaporins: from molecule to physiology. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2011;32(6):716–20. doi: 10.1038/aps.2011.59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ekanem E, Umoiyoho A, Inyang-Otu A. Study of electrolyte changes in patients with prolonged labour in Ikot Ekpene, a rural community in Niger delta region of Nigeria. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012;2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chebet I, Izudi J. Patterns and levels of serum electrolyte imbalance among women with obstructed labor in Uganda: A cross-sectional study. Midwifery. 2022;115:103486. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Quenby S, Pierce SJ, Brigham S, Wray S. Dysfunctional labor and myometrial lactic acidosis. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;103(4):718–23. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000118306.82556.43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wray S. Insights into the uterus. Experimental physiology. 2007;92(4):621–31. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.038125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arrowsmith S, Kendrick A, Hanley JA, Noble K, Wray S. Myometrial physiology–time to translate? Experimental Physiology. 2014;99(3):495–502. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.076216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arrowsmith S, Hamlin EC, Wall LL. Obstructed labor injury complex: obstetric fistula formation and the multifaceted morbidity of maternal birth trauma in the developing world. Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 1996;51(9):568–74. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199609000-00024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Neilson J, Lavender T, Quenby S, Wray S. Obstructed labour: reducing maternal death and disability during pregnancy. British medical bulletin. 2003;67(1):191–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ebrahim M, Larsen PB, Hannani D, Liest S, Jørgensen LN, Jørgensen HL. Preoperative risk factors including serum levels of potassium, sodium, and creatinine for early mortality after open abdominal surgery: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surgery. 2021;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01070-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kayiga H, Ajeani J, Kiondo P, Kaye DK. Improving the quality of obstetric care for women with obstructed labour in the national referral hospital in Uganda: lessons learnt from criteria based audit. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0949-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Musaba MW, Barageine JK, Ndeezi G, Wandabwa JN, Weeks A. Effect of preoperative bicarbonate infusion on maternal and perinatal outcomes of obstructed labour in Mbale Regional Referral Hospital: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ open. 2019;9(4):e026675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Musaba MW, Wandabwa JN, Ndeezi G, Weeks AD, Mukunya D, Waako P, et al. Effect of pre-operative bicarbonate infusion on maternal and perinatal outcomes among women with obstructed labour in Mbale hospital: A double blind randomized controlled trial. PloS one. 2021;16(2):e0245989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ministry of Health U. Uganda Clinical Guidelines 2016 2016. Available from: Available from: https://health.go.ug/sites/default/files/Uganda%20Clinical%20Guidelines%202016_FINAL.pdf.
  • 20.Musaba MW, Ndeezi G, Barageine JK, Weeks A, Nankabirwa V, Wamono F, et al. Risk factors for obstructed labour in Eastern Uganda: A case control study. PloS one. 2020;15(2):e0228856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sullivan KM, Dean MAG, Soe MM, MCTM M. An Introduction to OpenEpi. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer LG, Cunningham FG. Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1326–31. Epub 2009/11/26. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2bde8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Committee AMoS. AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors. 2020.
  • 24.Burger M, Schaller DJ. Metabolic acidosis. 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Omo-Aghoja L. Maternal and fetal Acid-base chemistry: a major determinant of perinatal outcome. Annals of medical and health sciences research. 2014;4(1):8–17. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.126602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lassey SC, Napoe GS, Carusi D, Schantz-Dunn J, Robinson JN. Hyponatremia among parturients transferred to the hospital after prolonged labor during an attempted home birth. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019;134(1):106–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Benali AI, Demmouche A. Calcium deficiency among pregnant women and their newborns in Sidi Bel Abbes Region, Algeria. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences. 2014;4(6):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moon HS, Lee SK, Chung JH, In CB. Hypocalcemia and hypokalemia due to hyperventilation syndrome in spinal anesthesia -A case report. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2011;61(6):519–23. Epub 2012/01/06. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.6.519 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3249577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ifudu O, Friedman EA. Kidney Injury, Electrolyte and Acid-Base Abnormalities Associated With Use of Alternative Medicine Products. Dialysis & Transplantation. 2009;38:124–7. [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002012.r001

Decision Letter 0

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

8 Feb 2023

PGPH-D-22-01944

Multiple electrolyte derangements among perioperative women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Nantale,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I would like to sincerely apologise for the delay you have incurred with your submission. It has been exceptionally difficult to secure reviewers to evaluate your study. We have now received three completed reviews; the comments are available below. The reviewers have raised significant scientific concerns about the study that need to be addressed in a revision. Please revise the manuscript to address all the reviewer's comments in a point-by-point response in order to ensure it is meeting the journal's publication criteria. Please note that the revised manuscript will need to undergo further review, we thus cannot at this point anticipate the outcome of the evaluation process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 23 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

Staff Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please amend your detailed Financial Disclosure statement. This is published with the article. It must therefore be completed in full sentences and contain the exact wording you wish to be published.

State the initials, alongside each funding source, of each author to receive each grant.

2. Please provide separate figure files in .tif or .eps format.

For more information about figure files please see our guidelines:  LINK

https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures 

https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures#loc-file-requirements 

3. We have noticed that you have uploaded Supporting Information files, but you have not included a list of legends. Please add a full list of legends for your Supporting Information files after the references list. 

4. In the online submission form, you indicated that "Data supporting the results reported in this manuscript can be obtained from the corresponding author on request.". All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons by return email and your exemption request will be escalated to the editor for approval. Your exemption request will be handled independently and will not hold up the peer review process, but will need to be resolved should your manuscript be accepted for publication. One of the Editorial team will then be in touch if there are any issues.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: I don't know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Good paper to emphasize the life threatening electrolyte derangement which are common among women with obstructed labour in the perioperative period. However, the study had some limitations by means of the lack of a comparison group of women who laboured successfully without obstruction makes it difficult to attribute these electrolyte derangements to obstructed labour.

Reviewer #2: 1. The study reported by the authors add to the literature what is already known about the effect of protracted labour on electrolyte levels. Since the baseline data as reported by the authors are already known in the literature, one would have expected that the authors would have considered extending the what is known about the subject by including at least birth outcomes to try to link the electrolyte derangements to maternal and fetal outcomes. However, this was not done even though the authors had ample time to have collected such data. If such data is available, authors should include this in the revised manuscript to bring out some novelty to the data presentation. The authors write on page 17 “. This information is of clinical importance because prolonged uncorrected metabolic acidosis is known to cause low fetal pH, low, Apgar scores and asphyxia in the newborn.” This is suggestive that maternal and/or fetal outcomes are dependent on these electrolyte levels. Thus, why the authors did not include such data collection is not so clear.

2. Since the most prevalent electrolyte disorder was hypobicarbonatemia, as reported by the authors on page 16, “Hypobicarbonatemia was the most prevalent electrolyte disorder, more than three quarters (¾) of the participants had a low median blood bicarbonate level of 12 mmol/L”, the authors should at least consider regression analyses for factors associated with this electrolyte derangement since it is most pronounced.

3. Also, since about one third of our participants had a hypocalcaemia (total calcium), author should consider predisposition to this as well.

4. Also, could the authors consider including as supplementary data analyses of factors predictive of participants having 3, 4, 5 or 6 electrolyte derangements? This would be an important addition since there might be reason(s) why one person may develop combinations of these electrolyte imbalances.

Reviewer #3: This is a cross-sectional study analyzing metabolic derangement among women undergoing urgent cesarean section for obstructive labour.

You state that hypocalcemia (total calcium) is common in your population. Is this possibly related to a pre-eclamptic condition of some of the mothers in your cohort? Also, labouring women (and even more so women with obstructed labour) present polypnea. Can this be related to observed calcium derangements? Please comment.

Factors listed in line 321-326 represent strong limitations to this study, and must be discussed in the limitation section.

A thorough English mothertongue revision should also be performed before resubmission.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Pradeep Kumar Dabla

Reviewer #2: Yes: Patrick Adu

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002012.r003

Decision Letter 1

Hanna Landenmark

13 Apr 2023

PGPH-D-22-01944R1

Multiple electrolyte derangements among perioperative women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Nantale,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Two reviewers reassessed the manuscript. Reviewer 3 would like additional clarification on some of their queries. Please ensure that you provide a point-by-point response to their comments.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 13 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Hanna Landenmark

Staff Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: I don't know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Ok to publish

Reviewer #3: I can't find in the revised manuscript a discussion addressing the points I raised in my previous review. Is hypocalcemia

possibly due to a pre-eclamptic condition? If yes, in what percentage of the set of patients presented by authors? Also, is hypocalcemia related to labouring polypnea of women? Please comment.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: The authors have made an study efforts to observe the women with obstructed labour in the perioperative period and shown having multiple electrolyte derangement, especially if they have used herbal medicines in labour which were more pronounced in the hypo (low) category. These observations will help in clinical evaluations further.

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002012.r005

Decision Letter 2

Julia Robinson

11 May 2023

Multiple electrolyte derangements among perioperative women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study

PGPH-D-22-01944R2

Dear Ms. Nantale,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Multiple electrolyte derangements among perioperative women with obstructed labour in eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Julia Robinson

Executive Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Factors associated with hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Factors associated with hyponatremia among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Factors associated with hypobicarbonatemia among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Factors associated with hypocalcaemia among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. Factors associated with perinatal death among women with obstructed labor in eastern Uganda.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Data. Stata dataset that includes all variables analysed for this manuscript.

    (DTA)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal letter 01_MD.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: REBUTTAL 140423.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The dataset used for this analysis have been uploaded as supplementary information.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES