Table 4.
Comparison Conditions, Measures, and Outcomes
Reference | N | Control or Comparison Condition | Standardized Outcome Measures or Qualitative | Animal-Assisted Intervention (AAI) Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
HORSES | ||||
Petty et al 2017 | 67 | Barn activity without horse involved | Child’s Attitude and Behavior toward Animals (CABTA) | +/ CABTA: + Animal Attachment Scale, / Animal Abuse Score |
Gabriels et al 2018 | 64 | No Horse Barn Activity | Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) | +/ ABC-C: + Irritability, / Hyperactivity + SRS: + Social Communication, + Social Cognition + SALT |
Coman et al 2018 | 50 | Waitlist Control | Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), Sensory Profile (SP), Sensory Profile School Companion (SPSC) | +/ SRS Parent: + Total Score, / Social Awareness, + Social Cognition, + Social Communication, + Social Motivation, + Autistic Mannerisms + SRS Teacher: + Total Score, + Social Awareness, + Social Cognition, + Social Communication, + Social Motivation, + Autistic Mannerisms +/ SP Parent: + Total Score, + Emotionally Reactive, + Low Endurance Tone, + Inattention/Distractibility, + Sedentary, / Sensory Sensitivity, / Sensation Seeking, / Oral Sensory Seeking, / Poor Registration, / Fine Motor Perception + SPSC Teacher: + Registration, + Seeking, + Sensitivity, + Avoiding |
Souza-Santos et al 2018 | 45 | Dance Intervention | Childhood Autism Rate Scale (CARS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), WHO Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS 2.0, social participation scale) | + CARS / FIM / WHODAS 2.0 (EAT intervention only) |
Kwon et al 2019 | 29 | Conventional therapy | Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test (REVT) and Preschool Receptive-Expressive Language Scale (PRES) and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children II (K-ABC-II) or cognitive domain of Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) | / REVT: / Reception, / Expression / PRES: / Reception, / Expression / Cognitive domain BSID-II / K-ABC |
Harris et al 2017 | 26 | Education as usual | Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS-2), Aberrant Behavior Checklist- Community (ABC-C), Measurement of Pet Intervention Checklist (MOPI) | / CARS-2 / ABC-C: / Hyperactivity, / Irritability / MOPI |
Ozyurt et al 2020 | 24 | Normal Care | Children’s global assessment scale (CGAS), McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD), social communication questionnaire (SCQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | + CGAS +/ FAD: / Problem solving, + Communication, + Roles, / Affective responsiveness, + Affective involvement, + Behavioral control, / General functions + SCQ + BDI |
Pan et al 2019 | 16 | Barn activity without horse involved | Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C), Salivary Cortisol | + ABC-C: +Hyperactivity, + Irritability, / Lethargy/Social Withdrawal, / Stereotypy, / Inappropriate Speech Behaviors +/ SRS: + Social Awareness, / Social Cognition, / Social Motivation, / Social Communication, / Autistic Mannerisms / SALT / Cortisol |
Anderson et al 2016 | 15 | None (Pre/post) | Autism Spectrum Quotient (ASQ), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS), Empathizing Quotient (EQ), Systemizing Quotient (SQ) | + ASQ +/ VABS: + Maladaptive Behavior, / Adaptive Behavior, / Communication, / Socialization +/ EQ/SQ: + Empathizing Quotient, / Systemizing Quotient |
Bystrom et al 2019 | 9 | N/A | Qualitative | + Reduction of stress, Increased calmness and Peaceful state of mind, Increased curiosity and interest, Increased likelihood of spontaneous attention |
Malcolm et al 2018 | 9 | N/A | Qualitative | + Improved social interaction and communication + Embodied multisensory experience |
Llambias et al 2016 | 7 | N/A | Engagement (video coding) | + Engagement |
Peters et al 2020 | 6 | N/A | Visual analog scale, Aberrant Behavior Checklist- Community (ABC-C) Hyperactivity and Irritability Subscales, Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) | + ABC-C: + Hyperactivity (4/5 participants), +Irritability (4/5 participants) +/ SRS-2: + Social motivation , + Social communication, / Social awareness, / Social cognition , / Restricted interests and Repetitive behaviors |
Kalmbach et al 2020 | 5 | N/A | Qualitative | + Parental perspectives on child’s experiences of the intervention (qualities of the horse and occupational therapist that favorably contributed to child’s experiences & children’s positive emotional experiences regarding the intervention) + Parental perspectives on the intervention’s influences on everyday life (favorable influences on child’s everyday life, favorable influences on family’s everyday life) (−) Parent concerns and dissatisfaction (e.g. too rigid, too limited, travel times) |
Tan et al 2018 | 5 | N/A | Qualitative | + Improved self-concept and enhanced emotional well-being + Child’s improved self-regulatory ability + Social benefits for the child + Benefits to Parents |
De Milander et al 2016 | 2 | None (Pre/post) | Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2) | + BOT-2: + Balance, + Coordination, + Strength |
Cerino et al 2016 | 1 | N/A | Qualitative | + Relationship with animal was used to encourage narrative from child to improve cognition and communication and relationship to the therapist. + Increased presence due to the safety created in the physical environment. |
van der Steen et al 2019 | 1 | None (Pre/post) | Scale for Emotional Development-Revised (SED-R), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Observed Social and Communication Skills | Parents: +/ SED-R: / Self-image in interacting with environment, / Anxieties, / Interacting with Peer, / Handling Materials, / Play Development, + Interacting with emotionally important others, + dealing with a changing environment, + Communication, + Aggression Regulation, + Moral Development, + Deal with her own body, + Emotion differentiation, + Emotion regulation + SDQ Total Difficulties +/ Social and Communication Skills: + Peer Relationship Problems (both mother & father), / Pro Social Behavior (mother not father), + Hyperactivity/inattention (both mother & father), / Conduct problems (both mother & father), / Emotional symptoms (mother not father) Researcher: + Verbal Communication, / Tension, + Turn-taking, + Separation Anxiety, + Positive emotion, / Negative emotions |
DOGS | ||||
Carlisle et al 2018 | 338 | N/A | Qualitative | + Theme 1: Facilitator and Benefit , + Theme 2: Learning Opportunity (−) Theme 3: Barrier, (−) Theme 6: Safety / Theme 4: Grief, / Theme 5: Fit, / Theme 7: Alternative Animal Options |
Fecteau et al 2017 | 98 | Waitlist Control group | The Parenting Stress Index - short form (PSI-SF), Salivary Cortisol | +/ PSI-SF: + Total Score, / Parental Distress Scale, + Parent-Child dysfunctional interaction scale, + Difficult Child Scale + Wakening and Morning Cortisol |
Wijker et al 2020 (B) | 52 | Waitlist Control | Percieved stress scale (PSS), symptom checklist-90-revised (SCL-90-R), social responsiveness scale of adults(SRS-A), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) | / PSS / SRS (rated by informant), / SRS (rated by self) / SCL-90- R / RSES |
Germone et al 2019 | 47 | Toy | Observation of Human-Animal Interaction for Research tool (OHAIRE) | +/ OHAIRE: + Communication, + Interaction, + Expression, / Interference behavior |
Hall et al 2016 | 37 | No Dog | Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF), Family Functioning (Brief FAM-III-GS) | + FAM-III-GS / PSI-SF: / Total Score, / Parental Distress Scale, / Parent-Child dysfunctional interaction scale, / Difficult Child Scale |
Becker et al 2017 | 31 | Social Skills Group without the Dog | Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2), Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI-2), Social Language Development Test (SLDT), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) | + SRS-2: + Social communication & interaction subscale, + Repetitive behavior subscale, + Total score +/ CDI-2: + Total score, / ineffectiveness scale, + functional problems subscale, / Negative Mood/Physical Symptoms, / Negative Self Esteem, / Emotional Problems, + Interpersonal Problems / SLDT: / Making Inferences, / Supporting Peers / RMET |
Grandgeorge et al 2017 | 29 | No Dog | Video Recording | + Visual Attention, + Orientation, + Joint Attention |
Silva et al 2019 | 23 |
Robotic Dog, No Stimulus |
Heart Rate Variability (LnRR, LnSDNN), Social Communication Behavior Coding | + Social Communication + Heart Rate Variability: + LnRR, + LnSDNN |
Hill et al 2020 (B) | 22 | Usual Care Occupational Therapy | Video Coding, Canadian occupational performance measure (COPM) | / On task behavior / COPM performance and satisfaction |
Avila-Alvarez et al 2020 | 19 | None (Pre/post) | Assessment of Communication and Interaction Skills (ACIS), Animal-assisted Therapy Flow Sheet (Richeson & McCullough, 2002) | + ACIS Total Score (12/20 subscales significant) + Animal-assisted therapy flow sheet (6/9 items significant) |
London et al 2020 | 17 | N/A | Qualitative | + Overarching Theme: Engagement as a precursor to progress + Characteristics of the dog + Therapeutic context + Goal directed achievements |
Michelotto et al 2019 | 15 | None (Pre/post) | Autistic Behavior Assessing Questionnaire (CACS-27) | Therapist Perception: −/ Environmental Factors −+/ Intrinsic Factors Parents Perception: −+/ Environmental Factors −+/ Intrinsic Factors |
Harwood et al 2019 | 11 | N/A | Qualitative | + Theme 1: Love and Companionship + Theme 2: Perception of Ownership + Theme 3: Comfort and Calming Influence + Theme 4: Canine’s Ability to Assist Child in Understanding Their World (−) Theme 5: Challenging Experiences |
Hill et al 2020 (A) | 10 | N/A | Qualitative | + Dog provides emotional safety and helped to build rapport between therapist and child / The dog is not sufficient for therapy engagement, the qualities of the therapist and goal directed nature of the intervention matter significantly. |
Silva et al 2018 | 10 | Robotic Dog, Toy | Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability | + Heart rate / Heart Rate Variability Parameters |
Hill et al 2020 (C) | 6 | N/A | Qualitative | + Incorporation of therapy dog in the session accelerates motivation in the therapeutic process (−) identified challenges |
Wijker et al 2020 (A) | 6 | None (Pre/post) | Social Responsiveness Scale for Adults (SRS-A) subscales social awareness, social communication and social motivation, Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) | / SRS- A: / Social Awareness, / Social Communication, / Social Motivation / RSES |
Jorgenson et al 2020 | 5 | N/A | Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment (MSWO) | / Noncontingent access to therapy dog slightly increased verbal statements for 1/5 participants / Contingent access to therapy dog increased social interactions for 2/5 participants |
Protopopova et al 2020 | 5 | N/A | Salivary Cortisol and Preference Assessment | + Decrease in cortisol (4/5 participants in dog conditions) + Preference Assessment ( For 4/5 children the dog functioned as a reinforcer) |
DOLPHINS | ||||
Ashtari et al 2018 | 10 | No Dolphin Water Activity | 2 selected subscales of the Bruininks-Oseretsky test for motor proficiency | + Bruininks-Oseretsky test: + Balance + Strength |
Griffioen et al 2019 (A) | 5 | None (Pre/post) | Video Recording | +/ Turn taking: + (2/5 participants), / (3/5 participants) +/ Spoken language: + (3/5 participants), / (2/5 participants) |
CATS | ||||
Hart et al 2018 | 108 | Typically Developing Children | Non-Standardized Survey | / Aggression in cats not heightened with children with ASD. / Cats less affectionate with children with ASD but still moderately affectionate. + Valuable bonding, attention and calming affection to the child |
MUTIPLE SPECIES | ||||
Carlisle et al 2020 | 764 | None | Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS), Companion Animal Bonding Scale (CABS); Animal Ownership for Families of Autistic Children Scale (AOFACS); Parental Stress Scale (PSS) | + 90% of parents and 71% of children said they were attached or very attached to companion animals −/ 4% of parents said child was “always or “very often” and 22% “sometimes” bothered by the pet −/ 1% of parents said child “always” or “very often” and 9% “sometimes” harmed their animal −/ 13% of parents said child was afraid of companion animal + Moderators of human-animal bond: + Income +/ Moderators of burden: + Stress, / Education, / Income |
Kregiel et al 2019 | 50 | None | Non-Standardized Survey | + 88% of parents say children had more frequent expression of feelings and emotions + 98% says increase in lively gestures + 86% more frequent vocal and verbal reactions + 52% increased responsibility and independence (−) limited access to services |
Grandgeorge et al 2020 | 42 | Typically developing children | Observation | / Increased visual attention in children with ASD with pet cats then pet dogs |
Note: Total score is indicated for scales unless subscales are listed. Table is sorted by descending sample size within each species category.