Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 8;22(14):2670–2681. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001599

Table 2.

Mean dietary diversity scores at baseline (January–March 2014) and after the 1-year intervention (February–March 2015), and DID impact estimates for these indicators, among SMG and comparison households and mothers, Kalalé district, northern Benin

SMG villages Comparison villages
WG NWG WG NWG SMG WG v. all Within SMG villages‡ Within WG§
Variable Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd DID see DID see DID see
HDDS
 n 282 358 214 420 1070 536 423
 Baseline 6·07 1·26 6·62 1·17 6·05 1·26 6·51 1·12
 Endline 6·50 1·23 6·14 1·41 6·24 1·24 5·69 1·41 0·85*** 0·18 0·06 0·25 0·94*** 0·24
WDDS-10
 n 286 322 220 382 1017 510 430
 Baseline 4·06 1·06 4·58 1·04 4·87 0·98 4·83 0·97
 Endline 5·28 1·01 4·91 0·97 4·43 1·07 4·01 1·12 0·77*** 0·15 0·16 0·15 0·83*** 0·19

SMG, Solar Market Garden; WG, women’s group; NWG, non-women’s group; did, difference-in-differences; see, standard error of the estimate; HDDS, Household Dietary Diversity Score; n, total number of women involved in the analysis; WDDS-10, Women’s Dietary Diversity Score (ten food groups).

***

P < 0·01 for DID estimate.

DID impact estimates between comparison and intervention groups controlled for age, household size, latrines, electricity connection, health-care insecurity, socio-economic status and type of group. ‡Within SMG villages = SMG WG v. SMG NWG.

§

Within WG = SMG WG v. comparison WG.