Table 3.
Total (n 97) | Completers (n 76) | Dropouts (n 21) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | sd | Mean | sd | Mean | sd | P value | |
Age (years) | 78·4 | 7·2 | 77·3 | 7·2 | 82·3 | 6·1 | <0·01 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 29·2 | 4·5 | 29·0 | 4·1 | 29·6 | 5·9 | 0·66 |
Number of diagnoses | 1·5 | 1·5 | 1·7 | 1·6 | 1·0 | 1·1 | 0·06 |
MMSE score‡ | 28·6 | 1·5 | 29·0 | 1·2 | 27·2 | 1·9 | <0·001 |
SPPB score‡ | 7·2 | 3·1 | 7·6 | 2·9 | 5·4 | 3·2 | <0·01 |
Katz-15 score§ | 2·1 | 2·7 | 1·9 | 2·6 | 3·2 | 2·8 | 0·07 |
% | % | % | |||||
Sex (male) | 34·0 | 31·6 | 42·9 | 0·33 | |||
Education level║ | 0·56 | ||||||
Low | 17·5 | 18·4 | 14·3 | ||||
Intermediate | 55·7 | 52·6 | 66·7 | ||||
High | 26·8 | 28·9 | 19·0 | ||||
Living alone | 55·7 | 59·2 | 42·9 | 0·22 | |||
Desire to lose weight§ | 52·7 | 53·3 | 50·0 | 1·0 | |||
Currently on a diet§ | 9·7 | 9·3 | 11·1 | 1·0 | |||
Nutritional status‡ | 0·81 | ||||||
Normal nutritional status | 79·2 | 77·6 | 85·0 | ||||
At risk of undernutrition | 19·8 | 21·1 | 15·0 | ||||
Undernourished | 1·0 | 1·3 | 0·0 | ||||
Type of care (more than one type per participant possible) | |||||||
Domestic care | 78·4 | 76·3 | 85·7 | 0·55 | |||
Personal care | 32·0 | 25·0 | 57·1 | <0·01 | |||
Nursing care | 9·3 | 5·3 | 23·8 | 0·02 | |||
Individual support | 3·1 | 2·6 | 4·8 | 0·52 | |||
Informal care | 32·0 | 32·9 | 28·6 | 0·80 |
MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; SPPB, Short Physical Performance Battery.
The PhysioDom Home Dietary Intake Monitoring (HDIM) intervention consisted of telemonitoring, nutrition education and follow-up by a nurse, implemented in a health-care setting among Dutch community-dwelling older adults from April 2016 to June 2017.
One missing value.
Four missing values.
Low education level: primary school or less; intermediate level of education: secondary professional education or vocational school; high education level: higher vocational education, university.