Table 5.
Acceptability of the PhysioDom HDIM intervention† as rated by participants and health-care professionals
| T1 | T2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (range 1–5) | sd | n | Mean (range 1–5) | sd | n | Cronbach’s α, T1/T2 | |
| Participants | |||||||
| General | |||||||
| I am satisfied about the project in general | 4·1 | 0·8 | 70 | 3·9 | 0·9 | 75 | |
| I am satisfied about the nutrition part of the project | 4·0 | 0·8 | 70 | 3·8 | 0·8 | 75 | |
| I am satisfied about the physical activity part of the project | 4·1 | 0·8 | 70 | 3·8 | 0·8 | 75 | |
| I am satisfied about the contact with the nurse | 4·3 | 0·6 | 23 | 3·8 | 0·8 | 24 | |
| Performance expectancy | 3·4 | 0·7 | 70 | 3·3 | 0·7 | 75 | 0·71/0·76 |
| Effort expectancy | 3·9 | 0·7 | 70 | 3·8 | 0·7 | 75 | 0·73/0·79 |
| Social influence | 3·2 | 1·2 | 69 | 3·1 | 1·1 | 73 | 0·94/0·89 |
| Facilitating conditions | 4·0 | 0·7 | 70 | 4·0 | 0·7 | 75 | 0·91/0·85 |
| Behavioural intent | – | – | – | 3·3 | 0·8 | 66 | |
| Mean (range 1–5) | sd | n | Cronbach’s α | ||||
| Health-care professionals | |||||||
| General | 8 | ||||||
| I am satisfied about the project in general | 3·5 | 0·8 | |||||
| Performance expectancy | 8 | ||||||
| Gains for job performance | 2·6 | 0·6 | 0·71 | ||||
| Gains for client | −0·81 | ||||||
| The project is useful to monitor nutritional status | 4·1 | 0·4 | |||||
| The project is useful to coach clients concerning physical activity | 3·9 | 0·4 | |||||
| The project is useful to coach clients concerning nutrition | 3·9 | 0·4 | |||||
| The project can contribute to a better health for clients | 4·1 | 0·4 | |||||
| Effort expectancy | 3·2 | 0·5 | 8 | 0·80 | |||
| Social influence | 8 | 0·26 | |||||
| I felt supported by colleagues in implementing the intervention | 3·3 | 0·5 | |||||
| The support of colleagues is important to me | 4·4 | 0·5 | |||||
| Behavioural intent | 2·3 | 1·0 | 8 | ||||
T1, 4·5 months after the start of the study; T2, 6 months after the start of the study.
†
The PhysioDom Home Dietary Intake Monitoring (HDIM) intervention consisted of telemonitoring, nutrition education and follow-up by a nurse, implemented in a health-care setting among Dutch community-dwelling older adults from April 2016 to June 2017.