. 2019 May 14;22(16):3035–3048. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019000715

Table 8.

Sensitivity analysis, using non-imputed data (complete case analysis), for the relationship between knowledge score and proportion of water and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption among the sample of elementary-school children aged 8–14 years (n 1049), London, Ontario, Canada, October–November 2016

	Percentage of total beverage consumption frequency attributable to water			Percentage of total beverage consumption frequency attributable to SSB^†
	β	95 % CI	P	β	95 % CI	P
Total knowledge score
Unadjusted	0·55	0·36, 0·74	<0·0001***	−0·56	−0·76, −0·37	<0·0001***
Model 1^‡	0·49	0·24, 0·74	0·0001***	−0·50	−0·69, −0·31	<0·0001***
Model 2^§	0·36	0·13, 0·60	0·0026**	−0·38	−0·53, −0·23	<0·0001***
Model 3^‖	0·34	0·06, 0·61	0·0160*	−0·33	−0·51, −0·15	0·0003***
Water knowledge score
Unadjusted	1·87	0·97, 2·78	<0·0001***	−2·13	−2·67, −1·59	<0·0001***
Model 1^‡	1·91	0·76, 0·43	0·0116*	−1·99	−2·83, −1·15	<0·0001***
Model 2^§	1·34	0·06, 2·63	0·0407*	−1·34	−2·01, −0·67	<0·0001***
Model 3^‖	1·31	−0·50, 2·67	0·0599	−1·22	−1·91, −0·54	0·0005***
Nutrition knowledge score
Unadjusted	0·55	0·32, 0·77	<0·0001***	−0·54	−0·76, −0·31	<0·0001***
Model 1^‡	0·44	0·18, 0·70	0·0009***	−0·44	−0·64, −0·24	<0·0001***
Model 2^§	0·33	0·07, 0·58	0·0112*	−0·36	−0·52, −0·20	<0·0001***
Model 3^‖	0·30	0·01, 0·59	0·0446*	−0·30	−0·48, −0·12	0·0010***

*P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001.

^†

SSB include fruit-flavoured drinks, regular pop, energy drinks and chocolate milk.

^‡

Model 1 adjusted for the sociodemographic characteristics sex, age, ethnicity, household income level, maximum household education level, child living arrangement and parental employment status.

^§

Model 2 added daily servings of fruits and vegetables and weekly junk food consumption frequency.

^‖

Model 3 added participation in a school milk programme, permission to leave school grounds at lunchtime and frequency of refillable water bottle use.