Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 31;22(18):3447–3464. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002891

Table 2.

Specific characteristics of studies included in the current systematic review of food environments relevant to obesity and related chronic diseases in Latin America

Study characteristic n %
INFORMAS dimension Food provision/retail 27 32·1
Food promotion 16 19·0
Food labelling 15 17·9
Food price 8 9·5
Composition & labelling 6 7·1
Food composition 6 7·1
Retail & price 3 3·6
Composition & price 2 2·4
Promotion & labelling 1 1·2
Policy/environment Environment 58 69·0
Policy 26 31·0
Urbanicity Urban 65 77·4
National 16 19·0
Rural 3 3·6
Study setting* Consumer FE 36 42·9
Community FE 17 20·2
Schools and surrounding areas 14 16·7
Hours of TV programming 9 10·7
Other 8 9·5
FE assessment method Direct 70 83·3
Indirect 7 8·3
Perceived 7 8·3
Association between FE and health outcome No (descriptive study) 60 71·4
Yes: diet/dietary components 13 15·5
Yes: weight/BMI/obesity 7 8·3
Yes: BMI & diet 3 3·6
Yes: non-communicable diseases 1 1·2
Results stratified by SEP No 65 77·4
Yes 19 22·6

INFORMAS, International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support; FE, food environment; SEP, socio-economic position; TV, television.

*

Study setting: consumer FE studies investigate characteristics of products sold in supermarkets and shops; community FE studies investigate density of food shops, distance to shops, perceived FE in neighbourhoods; school studies investigate foods sold in schools and surrounding areas; hours of TV programming studies investigate foods advertised on TV; other studies use household budget surveys.

FE assessment method: direct studies counted and classified e.g. number of shops or TV advertisements, or analysed food composition in a laboratory; indirect studies deduced something about the FE from other measures e.g. food prices through household expenditure data; perceived studies asked the study participants about their environment.