Table 2.
Study characteristic | n | % | |
---|---|---|---|
INFORMAS dimension | Food provision/retail | 27 | 32·1 |
Food promotion | 16 | 19·0 | |
Food labelling | 15 | 17·9 | |
Food price | 8 | 9·5 | |
Composition & labelling | 6 | 7·1 | |
Food composition | 6 | 7·1 | |
Retail & price | 3 | 3·6 | |
Composition & price | 2 | 2·4 | |
Promotion & labelling | 1 | 1·2 | |
Policy/environment | Environment | 58 | 69·0 |
Policy | 26 | 31·0 | |
Urbanicity | Urban | 65 | 77·4 |
National | 16 | 19·0 | |
Rural | 3 | 3·6 | |
Study setting* | Consumer FE | 36 | 42·9 |
Community FE | 17 | 20·2 | |
Schools and surrounding areas | 14 | 16·7 | |
Hours of TV programming | 9 | 10·7 | |
Other | 8 | 9·5 | |
FE assessment method† | Direct | 70 | 83·3 |
Indirect | 7 | 8·3 | |
Perceived | 7 | 8·3 | |
Association between FE and health outcome | No (descriptive study) | 60 | 71·4 |
Yes: diet/dietary components | 13 | 15·5 | |
Yes: weight/BMI/obesity | 7 | 8·3 | |
Yes: BMI & diet | 3 | 3·6 | |
Yes: non-communicable diseases | 1 | 1·2 | |
Results stratified by SEP | No | 65 | 77·4 |
Yes | 19 | 22·6 |
INFORMAS, International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support; FE, food environment; SEP, socio-economic position; TV, television.
Study setting: consumer FE studies investigate characteristics of products sold in supermarkets and shops; community FE studies investigate density of food shops, distance to shops, perceived FE in neighbourhoods; school studies investigate foods sold in schools and surrounding areas; hours of TV programming studies investigate foods advertised on TV; other studies use household budget surveys.
FE assessment method: direct studies counted and classified e.g. number of shops or TV advertisements, or analysed food composition in a laboratory; indirect studies deduced something about the FE from other measures e.g. food prices through household expenditure data; perceived studies asked the study participants about their environment.