Table 5.

Logistic results of the determinants of households’ consumption of micronutrient-rich foods in Kwara State, rural Nigeria, November 2014 (n 413)

Micronutrient-rich food consumption	OR	se	95 % CI	Marginal effects†
				dy/dx	se
Owns cattle, horses and camels (TLU)	0·96	0·03	0·90, 1·01	−0·01	0·01
Owns sheep, goats and pigs (TLU)	0·91 **	0·04	0·83, 1·00	−0·02 **	0·01
Owns chicken and geese (TLU)	1·37 ***	0·11	1·18, 1·59	0·07 ***	0·02
Farming is household primary activity	0·95	0·07	0·82, 1·10	−0·01	0·02
Aware of micronutrient-rich foods	3·86 ***	0·29	3·36, 4·48	0·29 ***	0·01
Household owns a refrigerator	1·65 **	0·38	1·06, 2·59	0·11 **	0·05
Household owns a radio	1·54	0·62	0·69, 3·39	0·09	0·09
Nupe community	0·93	0·18	0·64, 1·36	−0·02	0·04
Number of household members	0·99	0·08	0·86, 1·15	−0·00	0·02
Mother’s age in years	0·96 *	0·01	0·97, 1·00	−1·2 × 10–6 *	2·4 × 10–7
Mother has at least primary-level education	1·20	0·24	0·81, 1·78	0·04	0·04
Mother has at least secondary-level education	1·13	0·11	0·93, 1·37	0·03	0·02
Father has at least primary-level education	3·13 ***	0·11	2·92, 3·35	0·25 ***	0·01
Father has at least secondary-level education	2·37 ***	0·64	1·39, 4·01	0·19 ***	0·06
Constant	0·35 ***	0·15	0·15, 0·80
Pseudo R 2	0·094
Log pseudolikelihood	−256·58

TLU, Tropical Livestock Unit.

Robust se adjusted for the two community clusters.

^†Results reported as marginal effects:

^* 10 % level of significance (P < 0·1)

^** 5 % level of significance (P < 0·05)

^*** 1 % level of significance (P < 0·01).