Table 4.
CEBQ subscale | Standardised β
coefficient |
95 % CI for standardised β |
P value | R2 | ΔR2 | F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FR | 0·19 | 0·06, 0·09 | <0·001 | 0·06 | 0·04 | 91·23 |
EOE | 0·09 | 0·04, 0·10 | <0·001 | 0·03 | 0·01 | 18·90 |
EF | 0·14 | 0·04, 0·07 | <0·001 | 0·04 | 0·02 | 51·48 |
SR | −0·19 | −0·10, −0·07 | <0·001 | 0·06 | 0·04 | 92·17 |
SE | −0·21 | −0·12, −0·08 | <0·001 | 0·06 | 0·04 | 109·53 |
EUE | −0·03 | −0·05, −0·02 | <0·001 | 0·03 | 0·01 | 17·83 |
FF | −0·06 | −0·05, −0·01 | <0·01 | 0·02 | 0·04 | 9·52 |
FR, Food Responsiveness; EOE, Emotional Overeating; EF, Enjoyment of Food; SR, Satiety Responsiveness; SE, Slowness in Eating; EUE, Emotional Undereating; FF, Food Fussiness.
Child sex and age were forced into the models before adding each of the CEBQ subscales separately. Standardised β coefficient was −0·025 (P = 0·198) and 0·141 (P < 0·001) for the control variables sex and age, respectively.