Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 15;22(3):531–541. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002562

Table 2.

Mean calcium intake and prevalence of inadequate and excess calcium intake among Ethiopian women aged 15–45 years, by physiological status*

Single day Ca intake Estimated usual intake Simulation with 1·0 g/d supplementation Simulation with 1·5 g/d supplementation Simulation with 2·0 g/d supplementation
Physiological status n Mean (mg) sd <EAR (%) >UL (%) Mean (mg) sd <EAR (%) >UL (%) Mean (mg) sd <EAR (%) >UL (%) Mean (mg) sd <EAR (%) >UL (%) Mean (mg) sd <EAR (%) >UL (%)
Non-pregnant non-lactating 2385 440a 447 91·9 0 473 276 89·5 0 1453 243 0 <1 1955 244 0 3·4 2460 249 0 34·6
Pregnant 492 432a 470 91·3 0 438 260 91·2 0 1439 256 0 <1 1936 252 0 3·5 2436 251 0 30·6
Lactating 4425 509b 522 85·9 0 516 273 86·7 0 1516 272 0 <1 2016 272 0 5·5 2516 272 0 44·4

EAR, Estimated Average Requirement; UL, Tolerable Upper Intake Level.

a,bMean values within a column with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

*

Data are not weighted by population size; 558 participants had missing values for physiological status.

Columns 3–6: mean, sd, %<EAR and %>UL were calculated from raw reported data.

Columns 7–22: means, sd, %<EAR and %>UL were calculated through adjustments applied in deriving the ‘usual’ dietary intake using Intake, Monitoring, Assessment and Planning Program (IMAPP) software and external variables.