Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 12;22(9):1654–1666. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003804

Table 2.

Children’s Menu Assessment (CMA) categories scored in the cross-border comparative analysis of the restaurant consumer food environment for children in London, ON, Canada and Rochester, NY, USA (June–August 2016)

Rochester (n 50) London (n 323)
CMA category n % Mean score n % Mean score P value
Nutrition guidance
Any nutrition information 15 30·0 0·60 91 28·2 0·57 0·92
Symbol indicating healthy item 1 2·0 0·02 36 11·1 0·11 0·04
Entrées
Healthy entrée 13 26·0 0·48 103 31·9 0·55 0·50
Healthy entrée salad 2 4·0 0·08 8 2·5 0·05 0·63
Whole-grain option 7 14·0 0·28 64 19·8 0·25 0·44
Beverages
Juice, any 22 44·0 N/A 154 47·7 N/A 0·74
Juice, listed as 100 % juice 7 14·0 0·14 27 8·4 0·08 0·31
Milk, any 24 48·0 N/A 172 53·3 N/A 0·59
Milk, listed as low-fat, 1 %, or non-fat 10 20·0 0·20 37 11·5 0·11 0·14
Pop targeted at children 12 24·0 −0·20 146 45·2 −0·45 0·01
Opportunity for healthier beverage substitution 27 54·0 0·54 181 56·0 0·56 0·91
Free pop refills for children 1 2·0 −0·02 25 7·7 −0·08 0·23
Side dishes
Non-fried vegetables 8 16·0 0·32 84 26·0 0·52 0·18
Fruit, any 23 46·0 0·46 113 35·0 0·35 0·18
Fruit, without added sugar 10 20·0 0·20 90 27·9 0·28 0·32
Dairy, any 2 4·0 0·04 12 3·7 0·04 1·00
Dairy, low-fat 0 0·0 0·00 0 0·0 0·00 N/A
Opportunity for healthier side substitution 24 48·0 0·48 171 52·9 0·53 0·62
Desserts
Healthy desserts 0 0·0 0·00 19 5·9 0·06 N/A
Included in children's meal 5 10·0 −0·10 124 38·4 −0·39 <0·001
Toys/marketing
Branded marketing towards children 10 20·0 −0·20 23 7·1 −0·02 0·01
Toy included with children's meal 10 20·0 −0·20 31 9·6 −0·07 0·05
Total score N/A N/A 3·12 N/A N/A 2·87 N/A

N/A, not applicable.

The χ 2 test, or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate, was used to compare differences in proportions between Rochester and London.