Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 1;21(15):2762–2772. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001714

Table 3.

Mean (expected) liking, (expected) saltiness and buying intention scores (and their standard errors) for the soups with different communication messages, averaged across the five visits and separate from visit 1 to visit 5, among British consumers (n 493) aged 24–65 years, November–December 2013

Averaged across the five visits Per visit
Message on pack Visit 1 Visit 2 Visit 3 Visit 4 Visit 5
Group Soup Mean se Mean se Mean se Mean se Mean se Mean se
Expected liking before tasting 1 (n 104) 30 % reduced salt No 5·83a,b 0·08 6·37A 0·16 5·87A,B 0·18 5·69A,B 0·18 5·74A,B 0·2 5·46B 0·19
2 (n 107) 30 % reduced salt Nutritional 5·91a,b 0·08 6·07 0·16 6·06 0·19 5·89 0·18 5·67 0·22 5·87 0·19
3 (n 96) 30 % reduced salt Sensory 5·93a 0·09 6·16 0·20 5·96 0·17 5·96 0·19 5·77 0·20 5·80 0·20
4 (n 94) 30 % reduced salt Social 5·71b 0·09 6·22A 0·16 5·83A,B 0·18 5·63A,B 0·21 5·47A,B 0·21 5·38B 0·21
5 (n 92) Regular salt No 5·74a,b 0·09 5·99A 0·18 5·75A,B 0·20 5·82A,B 0·19 5·71A,B 0·21 5·46B 0·21
Perceived liking after tasting 1 (n 104) 30 % reduced salt No 5·50 0·10 5·43 0·24 5·64 0·22 5·42 0·24 5·66 0·23 5·34 0·23
2 (n 107) 30 % reduced salt Nutritional 5·76 0·10 5·64 0·23 5·92 0·21 5·68 0·23 5·89 0·23 5·66 0·22
3 (n 96) 30 % reduced salt Sensory 5·59 0·10 5·70 0·24 5·43 0·24 5·31 0·24 5·79 0·22 5·74 0·21
4 (n 94) 30 % reduced salt Social 5·40 0·11 5·69 0·22 5·35 0·25 5·33 0·22 5·37 0·24 5·27 0·25
5 (n 92) Regular salt No 5·57 0·11 5·74 0·25 5·75 0·23 5·38 0·28 5·54 0·25 5·45 0·27
Expected saltiness before tasting 1 (n 104) 30 % reduced salt No 4·13a 0·08 4·92A 0·18 4·27A,B 0·17 4·12A,B 0·19 3·75B 0·18 3·57B 0·19
2 (n 107) 30 % reduced salt Nutritional 3·80b 0·08 4·50A 0·17 3·95A,B 0·16 3·73A,B 0·18 3·45B 0·19 3·36B 0·17
3 (n 96) 30 % reduced salt Sensory 3·83b 0·08 4·75A 0·16 4·29A,B 0·19 3·50B 0·17 3·32B 0·18 3·26B 0·19
4 (n 94) 30 % reduced salt Social 3·92a,b 0·09 4·73A 0·20 4·06A,B 0·18 3·79A,B 0·20 3·65B 0·20 3·35B 0·19
5 (n 92) Regular salt No 3·93a,b 0·08 4·49A 0·18 3·98A,B 0·19 3·74B 0·20 3·62B 0·21 3·82A,B 0·20
Perceived saltiness after tasting 1 (n 104) 30 % reduced salt No 3·54 0·08 3·44 0·20 3·75 0·19 3·54 0·17 3·63 0·18 3·35 0·18
2 (n 107) 30 % reduced salt Nutritional 3·36 0·08 3·12 0·17 3·44 0·19 3·48 0·18 3·46 0·18 3·30 0·17
3 (n 96) 30 % reduced salt Sensory 3·25 0·09 3·11 0·19 3·44 0·20 3·14 0·18 3·23 0·20 3·34 0·20
4 (n 94) 30 % reduced salt Social 3·27 0·09 3·09 0·19 3·13 0·18 3·44 0·21 3·40 0·22 3·30 0·20
5 (n 92) Regular salt No 3·50 0·10 3·34 0·21 3·34 0·21 3·65 0·23 3·79 0·23 3·40 0·21
Buying intention 1 (n 104) 30 % reduced salt No 4·63 0·12 4·60 0·28 4·80 0·25 4·53 0·27 4·80 0·26 4·44 0·26
2 (n 107) 30 % reduced salt Nutritional 4·90 0·12 5·00 0·27 4·79 0·26 4·73 0·28 5·14 0·27 4·82 0·27
3 (n 96) 30 % reduced salt Sensory 4·92 0·12 5·01 0·27 4·78 0·27 4·75 0·27 5·09 0·25 4·98 0·26
4 (n 94) 30 % reduced salt Social 4·65 0·12 5·10 0·27 4·54 0·27 4·52 0·26 4·51 0·27 4·57 0·27
5 (n 92) Regular salt No 4·94 0·13 5·23 0·31 5·02 0·28 4·73 0·31 4·95 0·29 4·78 0·32

a,bMean values within columns with unlike superscript lower-case letters were significantly different (P<0·05).

A,BMean values within rows with unlike superscript upper-case letters from visit 1 to visit 5 were significantly different (P<0·05).

Expected and perceived liking and saltiness were measured on a 9-point scale: 1=‘not liked at all’/‘not at all salty’ to 9=‘liked very much’/‘very salty’.