Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 7;21(16):2982–2988. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002197

Table 3.

Constituent analysis of iodine intake and multivariate linear regression equations according to population group, Armenia, September–November 2016

Ln(Adj. UIC)=4·738+(0·0031×UNaC)+(0·0044×SI)
SAC Intake source n % Model fit
Native 114 46 Adj. R 2=0·23
Processed food salt 87 35 P=2·2×10−16
Household salt 47 19
Ln(Adj. UIC)=5·221+(0·0013×Adj. UNaC)+(0·000051×SI)
PW Intake source n % Model fit
Native 185 81 Adj. R 2=0·21
Processed food salt 40 18 P=2·2×10−16
Household salt 2 1
Ln(Adj. UIC)=5·193+(0·0026×Adj. UNaC)+(0·0029×SI)
WRA Intake source n % Model fit
Native 180 56 Adj. R 2=0·17
Processed food salt 97 30 P=1·7×10−14
Household salt 43 13

SAC, school-age children; PW, pregnant women; WRA, non-pregnant women of reproductive age; Ln(Adj. UIC), natural log of adjusted urinary iodine concentration (in μg/l); Adj. UNaC, adjusted urinary Na concentration (in mmol/l); SI, salt iodine content (in mg/kg).