Table 6.
Toddlers’ consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in relation to the home environment among low-income mother–toddler dyads (n 240), urban and suburban Maryland, USA, 2007–2010
| Within-subject effect | Between-subject effect | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home environment factor | Adjusted OR† | 95 % CI | P value | Adjusted OR† | 95 % CI | P value |
| Interacting with mother | 1·73 | 0·77, 3·85 | 0·183 | 1·22 | 0·34, 4·42 | 0·764 |
| Movement/translocation | 0·72 | 0·33, 1·54 | 0·389 | 2·00 | 0·69, 5·82 | 0·203 |
| TV on | 0·99 | 0·45, 2·17 | 0·984 | 1·62 | 0·73, 3·58 | 0·234 |
| Eating in chair at table or in high chair | 1·10 | 0·53, 2·31 | 0·795 | 0·21 | 0·09, 0·50 | 0·001* |
| Eating with another child or adult | 1·25 | 0·62, 2·53 | 0·536 | 0·38 | 0·14, 0·99 | 0·047* |
| Eating snack | 1·14 | 0·60, 2·15 | 0·692 | 3·96 | 1·35, 11·62 | 0·012* |
TV, television.
*
Denotes a significant P value (P<0·05).
†
Logistic mixed-effects regression models, adjusting for toddler age, toddler race, maternal age, marital status, poverty, recruitment location, the number of children in the household, time of day, day of week and compliance (number of responses).