Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 16;20(5):893–901. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002822

Table 3.

Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for metabolic syndrome across quartile of dietary energy density among female nurses (n 1036) aged >30 years, Isfahan, Iran

Quartile of dietary energy density
2 3 4 (highest)
1 (lowest) OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI P for trend*
n 254 257 251 253
Metabolic syndrome
Crude 1·00 1·25 0·75, 2·46 1·79 1·11, 3·25 1·96 1·52, 3·11 <0·001
Model I 1·00 1·21 0·76, 2·41 1·71 1·10, 3·21 1·90 1·48, 3·07 <0·001
Model II§ 1·00 1·14 0·82, 2·28 1·65 1·07, 3·11 1·78 1·36, 2·98 <0·001
Model III|| 1·00 1·02 0·77, 2·01 1·54 1·01, 2·89 1·59 1·19, 2·81 <0·001
*

By the use of Mantel–Haenszel extension χ 2 test.

Metabolic syndrome was defined as the presence of three or more of the following components: (i) abdominal adiposity (waist circumference >88 cm); (ii) low serum HDL cholesterol (<50 mg/dl); (iii) high serum TAG (≥150 mg/dl); (iv) elevated blood pressure (≥130/85 mmHg); (v) abnormal glucose homeostasis (fasting plasma glucose ≥110 mg/dl).

Adjusted for age.

§

Further adjusted for cigarette smoking, physical activity, socio-economic status, current oestrogen use, menopausal status and family history of diabetes and stroke.

||

Additionally adjusted for BMI.