Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 16;20(4):712–725. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002056

Table 3.

Original criteria ranked by key informants and finalized criteria for national workshop prioritizing exercises in an integrated, citizen-engaged, mixed-methods initiative to establish a Canadian nutrition and mental health research agenda

Criteria developed by advisory committee based on key informant rankings
Original criteria ranked by key informants Criteria category Asks… Factors to consider
  • 1.

    Impact on health

  • 2.

    Community concern/demand

  • 3.

    Applicability of research outcome

  • 4.

    Adequacy of current knowledge base (avoid duplication)

  • 5.

    Economic impact

  • 6.

    Magnitude of the problem

  • 7.

    Partnership building

  • 8.

    Feasibility

  • 9.

    Ethical acceptability

  • 10.

    Relevance

  • 11.

    Urgency

  • 12.

    Equity focus

  • 13.

    Funding support potential

  • 14.

    Political acceptability

Appropriateness Should we do it? Ethical and cultural issues Availability and adequacy of current information
  • Ethically and morally acceptable

  • Culturally appropriate

  • Non-reliance on food industry

  • Adequacy of current research-based information (avoid duplication)

  • Availability of pre-existing data

Relevancy Why should we do it? Equity-focused and community concern/demand Burden of illness (size and severity of problem)
  • Contribution to better equity in health

  • Serves community concern/demand

  • Broad in scope

  • Burden of illness

  • Magnitude of the issue

  • Interconnected with social determinants of health (poverty, food insecurity, housing)

Chance of success Can we do it? Capacity of the system to undertake the research Cost justification
  • Competency

  • Infrastructure, mechanisms

  • Support system

  • Resources

  • Likelihood of partnership building

  • Reasonable approach

  • Funding potential

  • Political acceptability

  • Pragmatic

Impact of the research outcome What do stakeholders get out of it? Chances of implementation of research recommendations Reduction of the burden, including costs and quality of life
  • Applicability to current practice

  • Forward/upstream thinking

  • Impact of research on mental health and quality of life within the population

  • Economic impact

  • Fiscal rewards for balancing healthy living and healthy mind