Table 3.
Original criteria ranked by key informants and finalized criteria for national workshop prioritizing exercises in an integrated, citizen-engaged, mixed-methods initiative to establish a Canadian nutrition and mental health research agenda
| Criteria developed by advisory committee based on key informant rankings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original criteria ranked by key informants | Criteria category | Asks… | Factors to consider | |
|
Appropriateness | Should we do it? | Ethical and cultural issues | Availability and adequacy of current information |
|
|
|||
| Relevancy | Why should we do it? | Equity-focused and community concern/demand | Burden of illness (size and severity of problem) | |
|
|
|||
| Chance of success | Can we do it? | Capacity of the system to undertake the research | Cost justification | |
|
|
|||
| Impact of the research outcome | What do stakeholders get out of it? | Chances of implementation of research recommendations | Reduction of the burden, including costs and quality of life | |
|
|
|||