Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 3;20(18):3333–3342. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003621

Table 4.

Differences by store size and ethnicity in distributors’ role in the placement and promotion of obesogenic products in small food stores in four urban areas in the USA (Baltimore, MD; Durham, NC; Minneapolis/St Paul, MN; and San Diego, CA), mid-October 2013 to July 2014

Savoury snack (%) Sugary beverage (%) Sweet snack (%) Confectionery (%) Frozen treat (%)
Incentives provided: Free/discounted products (n 23) (n 37) !(n 8) (n 28) (n 13)
Smaller 50 8
Larger 86** 39**
Ethnic 58
Non-ethnic 91*
Incentives provided: Signage/marketing (n 14) (n 31) (n 7) (n 16) (n 11)
Smaller 10 37 8
Larger 50*** 73** 35*
Incentives provided: Slotting payments (n 15) (n 7) (n 3) (n 7) (n 8)
Smaller 17
Larger 41*
Ethnic 0 0 0
Non-ethnic 21** 30* 27**
Distributor expectations for incentives: Price control (n 33) (n 26) (n 19) (n 7) (n 10)
Ethnic stores 69
Non-ethnic stores 31*

*P≤0·05, **P≤0·01, ***P≤0·001.

Analyses exclude stores that self-sourced products (one savoury snack; five sugary beverage; nine sweet snack; twenty-one confectionery; eight frozen treat).