Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;20(9):1699–1709. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000349

Table 3.

Critical nutrients determining the outcome of optimal solutions in each age–gender group: men aged 31–50 years (m), men aged 51–69 years (M), women aged 31–50 years (w) and women aged 51–69 years (W). The count shows how often a nutrient was either outside the model boundaries or critical

Current* ‘Nutritionally optimised’ ‘Critical point’, ‘Half’,§ ‘Minimum’, Count
α-Linoleic acid mMwW mMwW mMwW mMwW mMwW 20
Retinol activity equivalents mMwW mMW mMW mMwW mMwW 18
Ca W MwW MwW mMwW mMwW 15
Na mM mMw mMw mMw mMwW 15
Se MwW MW mMW mMwW MwW 15
Thiamin mMwW W wW mMwW mMwW 15
Fibre mMwW mMwW mMwW mM 14
DHA+EPA mMwW mMwW mMW m W 13
Vitamin B6 MwW Mw MwW mMwW 12
SFA mMwW mMW mMwW M 12
Folate equivalents mMwW wW wW wW 10
Vitamin D wW w wW mMwW 9
Water mMW mMwW 7
Fe w w w w w 5
Niacin wW wW 4
Vitamin E mMwW 4
Carbohydrates W W W 3
Alcohol W W W 3
Riboflavin m m 2
Vitamin C m m 2
Fat total w 1
Vitamin B12 m 1
Vitamin K M 1
K m 1
*

Nutrients outside boundaries in model (Table 1).

Binding nutrient constraints.

Point where % change in penalty/% change in pReCiPe becomes elastic: diets become less acceptable.

§

Environmental impact reduced to 50 % of current diet.

Minimum environmental impact possible within nutrient and product constraints.