Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 21;21(6):1019–1027. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003780

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Concordance of dietary intake reports across ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and 24 h recall, by food category, for matched two-hour time windows (exact 2 h time window, 2 h±2·5 min time window, 2 h±5 min time window; 879 observations), among 144 children (53 % female; mean age 9·6 (sd 0·9) years; 34·0 % overweight/obese), Los Angeles County, USA, Mothers’ and Their Children’s Health (MATCH) study. Concordance (Inline graphic) is defined as an identical report in both report sources for a given time window (i.e. a given food item was either reported eaten or not eaten). Discordance (Inline graphic, discordant, EMA only; Inline graphic, discordant, 24 h recall only) is defined as a conflicting report across report sources for a given time window (i.e. a given food was reported eaten in one source but not the other)