Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 14;21(7):1232–1242. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003871

Table 3.

Age of the participating children, home food availability scores and dietary pattern scores, by parental education, among Finnish pre-school children aged 3–6 years, DAGIS study, September 2015–April 2016

Highest education in the family
All (n 711) Secondary school or lower (n 148) Polytechnic degree (n 302) Master’s degree or higher (n 261)
Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd P value*
Age (years) 4·72 0·89 4·72 0·93 4·70 0·87 4·74 0·90 0·91
Home food availability scores
Fruits and vegetables availability score 20·40 2·81 19·96 2·93 20·26 2·80 20·82 2·71 <0·01
Sugar-enriched foods availability score 16·53 3·59 16·16 3·57 16·65 3·63 16·61 3·55 0·37
Dietary pattern scores§
Sweets-and-treats dietary pattern score −0·02 1·00 0·16 1·10 0·00 1·01 −0·14 0·90 0·01
Health-conscious dietary pattern score −0·02 0·94 −0·16 1·02 −0·10 0·89 0·16 0·93 <0·01
Vegetables-and-processed meats dietary pattern score −0·01 0·99 0·19 1·07 −0·02 1·03 −0·10 0·87 0·01
*

The P value shows the result of ANOVA to compare availability scores and dietary pattern scores between the three parental education levels.

A composite score describing the availabilities of fresh vegetables, fresh fruits or berries, frozen vegetables, frozen fruits or berries, and 100 % fruit juices in the home, range 5–25.

A composite score describing the availabilities of sweets or chocolate, sweet cookies, sweet pastries, ice cream, soft drinks and juices with added sugar in the home, range 6–30.

§

Scores derived for every participant by principal component analysis by assigning weights to each participant’s food consumption frequency. Higher pattern score indicates stronger adherence to the dietary pattern in question.