Table 4.
Cases | Model 1a | Model 1b | Model 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | HR | 95 % CI | HR | 95 % CI | HR | 95 % CI | |
Danish Dietary Guidelines Index | |||||||
Score <3 | 143 | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. | 1·00 | Ref. |
Score 3–<4 | 361 | 0·60 | 0·49, 0·73 | 0·76 | 0·63, 0·93 | 0·74 | 0·60, 0·89 |
Score 4–<5 | 316 | 0·48 | 0·40, 0·59 | 0·74 | 0·60, 0·91 | 0·69 | 0·57, 0·85 |
Score ≥5 | 82 | 0·52 | 0·39, 0·68 | 0·90 | 0·68, 1·20 | 0·83 | 0·62, 1·10 |
P for trend* | <0·001 | 0·214 | 0·051 |
Ref., referent category.
All analyses were stratified by date of enrolment (tertiles).
Model 1a: adjusted for length of follow-up (i.e. baseline age).
Model 1b: model 1a plus alcohol intake, alcohol abstinence, physical activity, smoking and education.
Model 2: model 1b plus baseline BMI, waist circumference, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes.
Test for trend was performed by including the categorised index as a linear variable in the model.