Table 4.
Intervention effect on days without fruit and vegetable (F&V) deliveries of the European School Fruit Scheme in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, on the F&V intake of third and fourth grade children (n 664) from twelve primary schools, beginning to the end of the 2012/13 school year
| Fixed part | Random part | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | Est. | se | t | P value | df | Coef. | Var. | P value | |
| Model I | |||||||||
| Intercept | γ 000 | 1·00 | 0·06 | 16·82 | <0·001 | 47 | u 00j | 0·13 | <0·001 |
| For period slope | |||||||||
| Intercept | γ 100 | 0·41 | 0·08 | 5·22 | <0·001 | 47 | u 10j | 0·21 | <0·001 |
| Model II | |||||||||
| Intercept | γ 000 | 1·25 | 0·09 | 13·61 | <0·001 | 45 | u 00j | 0·09 | <0·001 |
| Thrice weekly intervention | γ 001 | −0·40 | 0·13 | −3·03 | 0·004 | 45 | |||
| Twice weekly intervention | γ 002 | −0·34 | 0·13 | −2·68 | 0·01 | 45 | |||
| For period slope | |||||||||
| Intercept | γ 100 | 0·03 | 0·11 | 0·29 | 0·777 | 45 | u 10j | 0·11 | <0·001 |
| Thrice weekly intervention | γ 101 | 0·75 | 0·17 | 4·53 | <0·001 | 45 | |||
| Twice weekly intervention | γ 102 | 0·48 | 0·15 | 3·16 | 0·003 | 45 | |||
| Model III | |||||||||
| Intercept | γ 000 | 1·20 | 0·08 | 14·78 | <0·001 | 44 | u 00j | 0·08 | <0·001 |
| Thrice weekly intervention | γ 001 | −0·29 | 0·12 | −2·42 | 0·02 | 44 | |||
| Twice weekly intervention | γ 002 | −0·31 | 0·11 | −2·79 | 0·008 | 44 | |||
| Grade | γ 003 | −0·36 | 0·09 | −3·84 | <0·001 | 44 | |||
| Lunch at home | γ 010 | −0·31 | 0·06 | −5·25 | <0·001 | 513 | |||
| Gender | γ 020 | 0·32 | 0·06 | 5·59 | <0·001 | 513 | |||
| Low SES | γ 030 | −0·18 | 0·08 | −2·25 | 0·025 | 513 | |||
| Middle SES | γ 040 | −0·19 | 0·07 | −2·81 | 0·005 | 513 | |||
| For period slope | |||||||||
| Intercept | γ 100 | 0·03 | 0·10 | 0·32 | 0·754 | 44 | u 10j | 0·10 | <0·001 |
| Thrice weekly intervention | γ 101 | 0·76 | 0·16 | 4·70 | <0·001 | 44 | |||
| Twice weekly intervention | γ 102 | 0·50 | 0·14 | 3·60 | <0·001 | 44 | |||
| Grade | γ 103 | 0·23 | 0·12 | 1·90 | 0·064 | 44 | |||
| Lunch at home | γ 110 | 0·14 | 0·09 | 1·57 | 0·117 | 513 | |||
| Gender | γ 120 | 0·18 | 0·09 | 1·90 | 0·063 | 47 | u 12j | 0·10 | 0·046 |
| Low SES | γ 130 | −0·09 | 0·12 | −0·71 | 0·478 | 513 | |||
| Middle SES | γ 140 | 0·07 | 0·10 | 0·70 | 0·482 | 513 | |||
Coef., coefficient; Est., estimate; Var., variance components; SES, socio-economic status.
The variance of the level-1 residual (e tij ) was estimated to be 0·89 in Model I and Model II and 0·90 in Model III. The variance of the level-2 residual of intercepts (r 0ij ) was 0·26 in Models I and II and 0·20 in Model III. The variance of the level-2 residual of slopes for period (r 1ij ) was 0·34 in Models I and II and 0·30 in Model III.