Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 5;20(1):53–63. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002020

Table 3.

Odds of participants dropping out at month 6 by intervention arm, Food4Me Proof-of-Principle study

OR 95 % CI P *
Control (ref.) v.
L1 (low and high intensity) 1·40 0·99, 1·98 0·05
L2 (low and high intensity) 1·04 0·72, 1·48 0·85
L3 (low and high intensity) 1·07 0·75, 1·53 0·70
Control (ref.) v. personalised nutrition 1·17 0·87, 1·56 0·30
Low (ref.) v. high intensity feedback 1·81 1·36, 2·41 <0·001

ref., reference category; L1, Level 1 (personalised advice based on diet alone); L2, Level 2 (personalised advice based on diet and phenotype); L3, Level 3 (personalised advice based on diet, phenotype and genotype).

*

Logistic regression was used to test for significant differences between groups. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex and country. Significant P values are indicated in bold.