Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 9;20(5):765–773. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002317

Table 2.

Results of multiple regression models testing the effect of child-friendly and nutrition marketing cues on nutritional content for all products (n 715) sampled from one branch of a regional supermarket chain in the Southeastern USA, data collected from March to May of 2014

Energy density Fat Saturated fat Sodium Sugar Protein Fibre
B se β B se β B se β B se β B se β B se β B se β
Main effects models
Constant 2·26 0·08 0·09 0·01 0·03 0·002 0·01 0·001 0·13 0·01 0·05 0·003 0·02 0·002
Cereal aisle 1·67 0·13 0·53*** −0·03 0·01 −0·11* −0·01 0·004 −0·05 0·00 0·002 −0·02 0·16 0·02 0·44*** 0·02 0·01 0·18*** 0·05 0·004 0·50***
Child marketing score −0·01 0·06 0·00 −0·01 0·01 −0·08* 0·00 0·002 −0·05 0·00 0·001 −0·05 0·04 0·01 0·22*** −0·01 0·002 −0·22*** −0·01 0·002 −0·28***
Nutrition marketing score −0·18 0·06 −0·11** 0·00 0·01 −0·01 −0·01 0·002 −0·17*** 0·00 0·001 −0·11* −0·02 0·01 −0·11** 0·00 0·002 0·04 0·01 0·002 0·16***
Interaction effects models
Constant 2·29 0·08 0·10 0·01 0·03 0·002 0·01 0·001 0·13 0·01 0·05 0·003 0·02 0·002
Cereal aisle 1·64 0·13 0·52*** −0·03 0·01 −0·13** −0·01 0·004 −0·06 0·00 0·002 −0·01 0·17 0·02 0·46*** 0·02 0·01 0·17*** 0·05 0·004 0·48***
Child marketing score 0·02 0·06 0·01 −0·01 0·01 −0·06 0·00 0·002 −0·04 0·00 0·001 −0·05 0·03 0·01 0·19*** −0·01 0·002 −0·20*** −0·01 0·002 −0·25***
Nutrition marketing score −0·19 0·06 −0·12** 0·00 0·05 −0·02 −0·01 0·002 −0·18*** 0·00 0·001 −0·10* −0·02 0·01 −0·09* 0·00 0·002 0·04 0·01 0·002 0·15***
Interaction term −0·11 0·06 −0·06(*) −0·01 0·01 −0·08* 0·00 0·002 −0·06 0·00 0·001 0·03 0·02 0·01 0·11** −0·01 0·002 −0·08* −0·01 0·002 −0·09**

(*) P<0·10, *P<0·05, **P<0·01, ***P<0·001.