Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 14;20(16):2980–2987. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001926

Table 1.

Frequency of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, according to school- and individual-level sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics, among secondary-school students participating in COMPASS Guatemala (n 1042), 2014/15 school year

Frequency of soft drink consumption* Frequency of sweetened coffee/tea consumption* Frequency of energy drink consumption*
n % Mean sd P value Mean sd P value Mean sd P value
Total 2·58 1·89 2·40 2·06 0·58 1·22
School <0·001 <0·001 <0·001
School 1 158 15·2 2·97 1·88 3·13 1·99 0·78 1·32
School 2 522 50·1 2·93 1·84 2·87 2·06 0·79 1·38
School 3 303 29·1 1·94 1·80 1·40 1·67 0·15 0·64
School 4 59 5·6 1·78 1·65 1·41 1·83 0·34 1·12
School type <0·001 <0·001 <0·001
Private 362 34·7 1·91 1·78 1·40 1·70 0·18 0·74
Public 680 65·3 2·94 1·85 2·93 2·05 0·79 1·36
Gender <0·001 0·31 <0·001
Female 531 51·0 2·32 1·88 2·35 2·05 0·37 1·02
Male 511 49·0 2·86 1·85 2·45 2·08 0·80 1·37
Grade 0·001 0·04 <0·001
1 262 25·2 2·82 1·85 2·52 2·03 0·68 1·30
2 287 27·5 2·57 1·84 2·52 2·09 0·62 1·27
3 187 17·9 2·75 1·88 2·34 2·03 0·59 1·30
4 153 14·7 2·27 1·94 2·31 2·11 0·58 1·23
5 153 14·7 2·30 1·94 2·10 2·04 0·33 0·78
Weight status 0·21 <0·001 0·01
Healthy weight 508 48·8 2·51 1·90 2·15 2·04 0·51 1·11
Underweight 28 2·7 2·43 1·89 2·43 2·13 0·46 1·32
Overweight 102 9·8 2·41 1·90 2·43 2·04 0·57 1·17
Obese 29 2·8 2·76 1·64 3·07 2·02 0·93 1·41
Tobacco use 0·39 0·15 0·002
Non-current tobacco user 1019 97·8 2·58 1·88 2·39 2·06 0·57 1·20
Current tobacco user 23 2·2 2·87 2·12 2·87 2·07 1·13 1·84
Marijuana use 0·24 0·14 <0·001
Non-current marijuana user 1013 97·2 2·57 1·89 2·38 2·06 0·56 1·20
Current marijuana user 29 2·8 2·93 1·89 2·83 1·98 1·41 1·64
Alcohol use 0·02 <0·001 0·03
Non-current alcohol user 794 76·2 2·65 1·87 2·49 2·06 0·55 1·17
Current alcohol user 248 23·8 2·37 1·93 2·11 2·05 0·67 1·38
Sedentary behaviour <0·001 0·08 0·001
Not sedentary 130 12·5 2·66 1·89 2·43 2·06 0·61 1·25
Sedentary 912 87·5 2·06 1·76 2·18 2·08 0·38 0·98
Physical activity <0·001 0·10 0·67
Physically active 424 40·7 2·42 1·90 2·33 2·07 0·54 1·20
Not physically active 618 59·3 2·82 1·85 2·49 2·05 0·63 1·25
Bullying victimization 0·89 0·03 <0·001
Non-victim 850 81·6 2·58 1·88 2·35 2·06 0·54 1·16
Bullying victim 192 18·4 2·57 1·90 2·61 2·05 0·76 1·45
Weight goal 0·006 0·007 0·03
Not trying to do anything about weight 132 12·7 2·55 1·95 2·56 2·19 0·49 1·20
Gain weight 174 16·7 2·92 1·88 2·51 2·07 0·73 1·35
Lose weight 439 42·1 2·42 1·91 2·20 2·03 0·55 1·15
Stay the same weight 297 28·5 2·64 1·81 2·54 2·03 0·58 1·25
Frequency of purchasing lunch from the school cafeteria§ <0·001 <0·001 <0·001
0 590 56·6 2·12 1·87 2·08 2·03 0·33 0·88
1 74 7·1 2·49 1·71 2·22 1·87 0·47 0·97
2 97 9·3 2·76 1·72 2·26 2·03 0·69 1·28
3 60 5·8 3·08 1·55 2·82 2·05 0·90 1·42
4 23 2·2 2·91 1·70 3·43 1·95 1·17 1·47
5 198 19·0 3·72 1·66 3·21 1·99 1·15 1·72
Frequency of purchasing lunch in a fast-food place/restaurant§ <0·001 <0·001 <0·001
0 736 70·6 2·35 1·92 2·34 2·08 0·50 1·14
1 146 14·0 2·64 1·59 2·02 1·91 0·62 1·22
2 75 7·2 3·41 1·68 2·88 2·07 0·48 1·08
3 28 2·7 3·57 1·73 2·93 1·98 0·82 1·22
4 14 1·4 3·29 1·38 2·86 1·70 1·36 1·69
5 43 4·1 4·09 1·57 3·26 2·05 1·56 1·89
Frequency of purchasing snacks from a school vending machine§ <0·001 <0·001 <0·001
0 844 81·0 2·45 1·89 2·25 2·06 0·50 1·12
1 57 5·5 2·25 1·55 2·46 1·79 0·60 1·10
2 36 3·5 3·03 1·56 2·50 1·95 0·64 1·29
3 28 2·7 3·25 1·60 3·71 1·56 1·07 1·68
4 8 0·7 3·75 1·91 3·63 2·07 1·63 1·77
5 69 6·6 3·78 1·79 3·36 2·05 1·25 1·79
Frequency of purchasing snacks from a vending machine, corner store, snack bar or canteen off school property§ <0·001 <0·001 <0·001
0 820 78·7 2·39 1·88 2·25 2·07 0·45 1·09
1 82 7·9 2·61 1·70 2·49 1·87 0·57 0·98
2 61 5·9 3·57 1·51 3·25 1·89 1·18 1·53
3 24 2·3 3·83 1·46 2·96 2·05 1·17 1·43
4 7 0·7 3·29 1·70 3·57 2·15 1·86 2·27
5 48 4·5 3·90 1·78 3·25 2·01 1·52 1·95
*

Number of weekdays (0–5 d) that participants reported consuming beverage.

P values derived from univariate Poisson regression analyses including each outcome and each explanatory variable.

Participants with missing weight status (n 375) were included in analyses, although not shown here.

§

Number of weekdays (0–5 d) that participants reported the food purchasing behaviour.