Table 2.
Study 1* (n 20) | Study 2† (n 10) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interviewer-administered | ASA24-Kids-2014 | Interviewer-administered | ASA24-Kids-2014 | |||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
How would you rate the ease of reporting what you ate? | ||||||||
Very/somewhat easy | 9 | 90 | 5 | 50 | 8 | 80 | 8 | 80 |
Neutral | 1 | 10 | 4 | 40 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 10 |
Somewhat difficult | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
Do you think the time it took to complete the recall was… | ||||||||
The right amount of time? | 10 | 100 | 7 | 70 | 10 | 100 | 5 | 50 |
Too much time? | 0 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 50 |
About what percentage of foods could not be found? | ||||||||
Less than 10 % of foods | 10 | 10 | 7 | 70 | 9 | 90 | 9 | 90 |
10–25 % of foods | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
25–50 % of foods | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All participants in both studies completed the exit interview (n 30).
Responses from participants (n 20) in the 6-week randomized study comparing reported energy intake and number of foods. Each participant responded based on his/her assigned method only, either ASA24-Kids-2014 (n 10) or interviewer-administered recall (n 10).
Responses from participants (n 10) who did one of each type of recall, ASA24-Kids-2014 and interviewer-administered. Each participant responded to questions about both methods.