Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;11(6):2530–2546. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3311

TABLE 2.

Quality assessment.

Study Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Selective reporting Other sources of bias Blinding (participants and personnel) Blinding (outcome assessment) Incomplete outcome data General quality
El‐Sayed (2011) L L H L L U L Moderate
Moradi et al. (2012) L H H H H H L Low
Rafiee Vardanjani et al. (2013) L H H H L U L Low
Farzanegi (2014) L H H H H H L Low
Fakoori Jouibari et al. (2014) L H H H L U L Low
Zakizadeh et al. (2015) L H H L H H L Low
Esmaillzadeh et al. (2015) L L H L H H L Low
Adelnia Najafabadi et al. (2015) L L H L L H L Low
Dehghan et al. (2016) L H H H L U L Low
Wainstein et al. (2016) L L L L L U L
Marjan Bedakhanian et al. (2017) L L H H H H L Low
Gheflati et al. (2019) L L H L H H L Low
Ghorbanian et al. (2019) L H H H H H L Low
Papoli et al., 2019) L L H L H H L Low
Darvish Damavandi et al., 2021) L L H L L U L Moderate
Delvarianzadeh et al., 2021) L H H H L U L Low

Abbreviations: H, high‐risk of bias; L, low‐risk of bias; U, unclear‐risk of bias.