Skip to main content
. 2023 May 30;14:1125038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125038

Table 4.

Comparison of 2D and 4D flow assessment of PI and mean flow.

Vessel Subject group Mean difference (4D – 2D) Standard deviation of difference
PI Mean flow (ml/s) PI Mean flow (ml/s)
RMCA HV −0.17** 0.72** 0.16 0.72
P −0.15*** 0.17 0.09 0.50
RACA HV −0.14* 0.34* 0.20 0.42
LACA HV −0.11 0.35 0.18 0.54
SSS HV −0.02 0.46** 0.06 0.44
P 0.00 0.34* 0.07 0.45
StS HV 0.03 −0.04 0.15 0.38
P −0.03 0.16 0.09 0.24

2D/4D method comparisons of PI and mean flow measurements across intracranial vessels, assessed using paired t-tests and Bland-Altman statistics. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. RMCA, right middle cerebral artery; RACA/LACA, right/left anterior cerebral artery; SSS, superior sagittal sinus; StS, straight sinus; HV, healthy volunteers; P, patients (with sporadic small vessel disease).