Table 1.
Implementation of the Decision Aid by Site (N = 1553)
| Academic Center (n = 1213) | LAC-DHS (n = 340) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUSIQ score a | |||
| Environment | 12/14 | 8/14 | |
| Organization | 33.75/42 | 42/42 | |
| QI support | 14/34 | 12/34 | |
| QI team | 59.67/63 | 63/63 | |
| Microsystem | 24/28 | 25/28 | |
| Other | 1/7 | 7/7 | |
| Total | 144.4/168 | 157/168 | |
| Implementation | |||
| Eligible (among screened) | 348 (29%) | 73 (21%) | 0.008 |
| Reach | |||
| Invited (among eligible) | 229 (66%) | 44 (60%) | 0.36 |
| Fidelity | |||
| Completed (among invited) | 177 (77%) | 35 (80%) | 0.74 |
| Post-MD survey completed (among DA completed) | 78 (44%) | 21 (60%) | 0.31 |
DA, decision aid; LAC-DHS, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services; MUSIQ, Model for Understanding Success in Quality.
a
Higher scores indicate more favorable contextual factors and a higher likelihood of QI success.