Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;56(6):1220–1238.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.04.002

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Anatomical distribution of MNPs in neonatal and adult PP

(A) FACS quantification of CD4+ T cells and phagocytic cells in PP. Ratio of mean T cell:phagocyte is indicated.

(B) Sample preparation and signal distribution model of CD11c using radial segmentation of the PP to obtain Δ.

(C) Δ calculated in individual PP (n = 25–36 follicles, Kruskall-Wallis test).

(D, E, and G) Representative spectral confocal imaging projection of PP illustrating anatomical distribution of (D) TLR3+IRF8+CD11c+CX3CR1 cDC1 (TLR3, orange; IRF8, magenta; GFP, green; CD11c, red; CD4, blue [only TLR3+ IRF8+ cells represent cDC1]), (E) SIRPα+CD11c+CX3CR1lysozyme cDC2 (SIRPα, magenta; EpCAM, gray; GFP, green; CD11c, red; lysozyme, yellow; CD4, blue [arrowheads point toward cDC2 in the SED]) and (G) RORγt+CD11c+CX3CR1CD4 APC (RORγt, magenta; GFP, green; CD11c, red; lysozyme, yellow; CD4, blue [boxed areas of individual RORγt+APC shown below]). Scale bars, 20 μm.

(F) Ratio between SIRPα+CX3CR1+Lysozyme+CD11c+ MC and SIRPα+CX3CR1lysozymeCD11c+ cDC2 in SED shown in (E). (n = 5–6, median, Mann-Whitney U test.) Each dot represents one animal (A) or one follicle (C and G). See also Figure S2.