Table 3 –
Covariate-adjusted meta-regression comparing efficacy and toxicity between salvage modalities and radical prostatectomy
| 2-yr RFS | 5-yr RFS | Severe GU toxicity | Severe GI toxicity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Radical prostatectomy | ||||
| Adjusted percenta (95% CI) | 72% (66–78%) | 53% (46%–59%) | 21% (16%–26%) | 1.5% (0.4%–3.2%) |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.0 | 1.0 | NA | NA |
| p value | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| R2 (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Cryotherapy | ||||
| Adjusted percenta (95% CI) | 66% (59–72%) | 57% (49–65%) | 15% (8–23%) | 0.9% (0.3–1.8%) |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 0.74 (0.49–1.12) | 1.20 (0.80–1.79) | NA | NA |
| p value | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| R2 (%) | 25 | 0.0 | 8.2 | 27 |
| HIFU | ||||
| Adjusted percenta (95% CI) | 52% (45%–59%) | 46% (37%–55%) | 23% (17%–30%) | 0.8% (0.1%–2.1%) |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 0.42 (0.28–0.64) | 0.76 (0.48–1.21) | NA | NA |
| p value | <0.001 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| R2 (%) | 0.0 | 41 | 15 | 22 |
| SBRT | ||||
| Adjusted percenta (95% CI) | 58% (46–69%) | 56% (37–73%) | 5.6% (1.4–12%) | 0.0% (0.0–1.2%) |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 0.52 (0.30–0.93) | 1.13 (0.50–2.58) | NA | NA |
| p value | 0.03 | 0.8 | <0.001 | 0.07 |
| R2 (%) | 55 | 4.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 |
| HDR | ||||
| Adjusted percenta (95% CI) | 77% (69–83%) | 58% (52–64%) | 9.6% (6.0–13.9%) | 0.0% (0.0–0.3%) |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.26 (0.77–2.09) | 1.25 (0.88–1.78) | NA | NA |
| p value | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| R2 (%) | 0.0 | 91 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| LDR | ||||
| Adjusted percenta (95% CI) | 79% (72–85%) | 53% (43–63%) | 9.1% (5.2–14%) | 2.1% (0.6–4.0%) |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.49 (0.89–2.50) | 1.02 (0.63–1.67) | – | – |
| p value | 0.13 | 0.9 | 0.001 | 0.6 |
| R2 (%) | 4.3 | 5.2 | 12 | 20% |
CI = confidence interval; GI = gastrointestinal; GU = genitourinary; HDR=high-dose-rate brachytherapy; HIFU = high-intensity focused ultrasound; LDR=low-dose-rate brachytherapy; NA = not available; RFS = recurrence-free survival; SBRT = stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Significant p-values after Bonferroni correction appear in bold.
Back-transformed regression coefficients for ease of interpretation.