Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 27;44(4):768–775. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001323

TABLE 3.

Crude and adjusted model of the association between tinnitus annoyance and the NFR

β 95% CI (for β) p
Crude model
 No tinnitus 0 <0.001
 Tinnitus annoyance 0–20 7.2 1.9 to 12.5
 Tinnitus annoyance 21–40 10.8 4.2 to 17.3
 Tinnitus annoyance 41–60 10.9 3.8 to 18.0
 Tinnitus annoyance 61–100 13.5 6.4 to 20.6
Adjusted model*
 No tinnitus 0 0.79
 Tinnitus annoyance 0–20 −1.2 −9.0 to 6.5
 Tinnitus annoyance 20–40 4.0 −4.2 to 12.1
 Tinnitus annoyance 40–60 2.8 −4.7 to 10.4
 Tinnitus annoyance 60–100 −0.1 −7.7 to 7.6
 Distress 2.4 2.1 to 2.8 <0.001
 Somatization 0.8 0.5 to 1.2 <0.001
 Depression −1.4 −2.7 to −0.1 0.038
 AIADH 0.17 0.05 to 0.29 0.007
 Speech recognition in noise (SRT) 0.46 −0.25 to 1.20 0.13
 Tinnitus annoyance SRT 0.20
 Tinnitus annoyance 0–20 SRT −0.9 −2.2 to 0.3
 Tinnitus annoyance 20–40 SRT −0.1 −1.5 to 1.3
 Tinnitus annoyance 40–60 SRT 0.0 −1.3 to 1.3
 Tinnitus annoyance 60–100 SRT 1.1 −0.3 to 2.5

The effect size is the regression coefficient in NFR percentage. β is the regression coefficient of the independent variable.

*

Adjusted Model is corrected for the effect modifier speech reception threshold and the confounders distress, somatization, and AIADH.

An interaction with effect modifier SRT.

AIADH indicates Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap (self-reported hearing disability score); CI, confidence interval; NFR, need for recovery; SRT, speech reception threshold.