Table 3.
Association Between the Students’ Views on the Perceived Qualities of WB and Satisfaction
| Level | N (%) | Y (%) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WB is Engaging | ||||
| n | 15 | 106 | ||
| Would you use WB like this as a revision tool for | N | 7 (37) | 12 (63) | <0.001 |
| clinical ophthalmology? | Y | 8 (8) | 94 (94) | |
| Would you recommend WB like this to other | N | 6 (35) | 11 (65) | 0.002 |
| students for clinical ophthalmology learning? | Y | 9 (9) | 95 (91) | |
| WB helps with understanding. | ||||
| n | 20 | 101 | ||
| Would you use WB like this as a revision tool for | N | 13 (68) | 6 (32) | <0.001 |
| clinical ophthalmology? | Y | 7 (7) | 95 (93) | |
| Would you recommend WB like this to other | N | 11 (65) | 6 (35) | <0.001 |
| students for clinical ophthalmology learning? | Y | 9 (9) | 95 (91) | |
| WB improves memory and recall. | ||||
| n | 21 | 100 | ||
| Would you use WB like this as a revision tool for | N | 17 (89) | 2 (11) | <0.001 |
| clinical ophthalmology? | Y | 4 (4) | 98 (96) | |
| Would you recommend WB like this to other | N | 16 (94) | 1 (6) | <0.001 |
| students for clinical ophthalmology learning? | Y | 5 (5) | 99 (95) |
Notes: Results are further broken down into students’ perceptions on major impacts of the video and if they would accordingly recommend it or use it as a revision tool. For example, “WB is engaging” - 15 said no and 106 said yes. Of the ones who said no, 7 would not like to use it as a revision tool and 8 would. Of the ones who said yes 12 would not like to use it as a revision tool but 94 would. Bold: statistically significant results.
Abbreviations: WB, whiteboard animation videos; Y, yes; N, no; n, number of respondents.