. 2023 Jan 5;27(6):2629–2639. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04829-8

Table 4.

The mean, standard deviation (SD) values, and Bonferroni’s post hoc test results for pair-wise comparison between biaxial flexural strength (MPa) of the three materials with different thickness ratios before and after aging.

Aging	Thickness ratio T_C:T_V	IPS e.max CAD (CAD LD)		HIPC CAD (CAD C)		Crea.lign (LC)		P value
Aging	Thickness ratio T_C:T_V	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	P value
Before aging	1:0.5 mm	197.9 ^C	14	377.3 ^B	17.9	446.8 ^A	24.7	<0.001*
	0.7:0.8 mm	235 ^B	39.9	388.3 ^A	34.1	379.5 ^A	36	<0.001*
	0.5:1 mm	296.1 ^B	37.6	193 ^C	32.3	363.2 ^A	42	<0.001*
After aging	1:0.5 mm	88.3 ^C	10.2	210.8 ^B	6.4	300.7 ^A	23.2	<0.001*
	0.7:0.8 mm	198.1 ^B	6.6	246.7 ^A	27.6	277.1 ^A	13.4	<0.001*
	0.5:1 mm	208.4 ^A	16.2	113.4 ^B	23.2	209.9 ^A	18.6	<0.001*

Different superscripts in the same row indicate statistically significant difference between materials

*Significant at P ≤ 0.05