Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022 Dec 14;43(4):259–269. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000764

Table 1.

Summary of studies testing behavioral interventions for smoking cessation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors (Year) Conditions Compared Sample Characteristics Baseline Lung Function Duration of Intervention Outcome Results
Lou et al. (2013) Usual care plus educational materials. N=1,748; age range=~40-80 yr; 51.9% women; education level= 8.7% “high”, 18.5% “middle”, 72.8% “low”; household income= 8.4% “high”, 83.9% “middle”, 7.7% “low” MRC=0 (5.1%), 1 (19.8%), 2 (28.5%), 3 (27.8%), 4 (18.8%) 2 yr Self-reported smoking status plus biochemically confirmed sustained abstinence between 24-30 mo (breath CO ≤10 ppm) Rate of sustained abstinence was higher for participants in the intervention (46.4%) vs. usual care (3.4%) (P<.001).
Intervention: intensive individual and group counseling plus educational materials. N=1,814; age range=~40-80 yr; 52.1% women; education level=8.8% “high”, 18.0% “middle”, 73.2% “low”; household income= 8.2% “high”, 84.3% “middle”, 7.5% “low” MRC=0 (5.0%), 1 (19.7%), 2 (28.9%), 3 (27.7%), 4 (18.7%)
Streck et al. (2018) Control: non-contingent vouchers (i.e., delivery of monetary vouchers independent of smoking status). N=16; Age 57.9 ±8.1 yr; 50% women; yr of education= 12.8 ±2.9 Postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC 59.9 ± 11.6% 2 wk Biochemically confirmed abstinence between 1-5 d (breath CO ≤ 6 ppm) and 6-14 d (urine cotinine ≤80 ng/mL) Except for 12 d, abstinence rates were higher for participants in the intervention (~40%) vs. control (~10%) on 9-14 d (P<.05). No differences between conditions on 1-8 d.
Intervention: contingent vouchers (delivery of vouchers dependent on biochemically verified abstinence, escalating schedule ($9.00 + 1.50 for each subsequent negative sample), temporary reset back to $0 for positive or missing samples. N=13; Age 55.8 ±6.8 yr; 46% women; yr of education= 12.8±1.8 Postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC 52.4 ±13.3%
Wilson et al. (2008) Usual care N=35; Age 61.4 ±8 yr; 49% women; education and household income not reported FEV1 54.3 ±20.0% 5 wk Biochemically confirmed abstinence at 1-yr follow-up (breath CO ≤10 ppm; saliva cotinine ≤10 ng/mL) No difference between conditions.
Intervention 1: individual counseling (one-to-one sessions between patient and nurse), optional NRT. N=27; Age 61.0 ±8 yr; 48% women; education and household income not reported FEV1 52.1 ±20.0%
Intervention 2: group counseling (group of patients and 2 nurses), optional NRT. N=29; Age 60.4 ± 9 yr; 59% women; education and household income not reported FEV1 54.6 ± 23.0 %

Note: All studies summarized in Table 1 used randomized controlled trials.

Abbreviations: MRC, Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (higher values indicate greater dyspnea); FEV1, Forced Expiratory Volume during 1st sec of forced expiration; FVC, Forced Vital Capacity; NRT, Nicotine Replacement Therapy.

“Usual care” for smoking cessation generally consists of low-intensity health education, simple smoking cessation advice, and encouragement to quit smoking.

Data presented as mean ± SD