Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Dec 14;19(6):2497–2507. doi: 10.1002/alz.12875

Table 2.

Selection of the most parsimonious model for predicting cognitive decline in patients with amnestic MCI and amnestic mild dementia

Model Plasma
p-
tau217
APOE ε4
status
Plasma

ratio
Plasma
NfL
MR AD
cortex
Baseline
cognition
Tau-PET R2 p-value AIC
Full plasma model −0.11 (0.91) 0.38 (0.71) 0.54 (0.59) −1.85 (0.07) 2.43 (0.02) 3.27 (0.001) −4.89 (<0.0001) 0.44 <0.0001 108
plasma model −1 0.37 (0.71) 0.54 (0.59) −1.87 (0.06) 2.48 (0.01) 3.28 (0.001) −5.30 (<0.0001) 0.44 <0.0001 106
plasma model −2 0.41 (0.68) −1.99 (0.05) 2.47 (0.02) 3.27 (0.001) −5.34 (<0.0001) 0.44 <0.0001 104
plasma model −3 −2.02 (0.046) 2.48 (0.01) 3.29 (0.001) −5.49 (<0.0001) 0.44 <0.0001 103
plasma model −4 2.36 (0.02) 3.19 (0.002) −5.59 (<0.0001) 0.42 <0.0001 105
plasma model −5 3.18 (0.002) −6.08 (<0.0001) 0.39 <0.0001 109
plasma model −6 −6.26 (<0.0001) 0.33 <0.0001 117
Model CSF p-
tau217
APOE ε4
status
CSF Aβ
ratio
MR AD
cortex
CSF
NfL
Baseline
cognition
Tau-PET R2 p-value AIC
Full CSF model 0.22 (0.82) −0.67 (0.51) −1.16 (0.25) 2.56 (0.01) −2.90 (0.005) 3.13 (0.002) −4.27 (<0.0001) 0.47 <0.0001 102
CSF model −1 −0.69 (0.49) −1.32 (0.19) 2.59 (0.01) −2.91 (0.004) 3.13 (0.002) −5.26 (<0.0001) 0.47 <0.0001 100
CSF model −2 −1.13 (0.26) 2.66 (0.009) −2.84 (0.005) 3.17 (0.002) −5.32 (<0.0001) 0.47 <0.0001 98.8
CSF model −3 2.70 (0.008) −2.90 (0.005) 3.04 (0.003) −5.29 (<0.0001) 0.46 <0.0001 98.2
CSF model −4 −2.58 (0.01) 3.04 (0.003) −5.85 (<0.0001) 0.42 <0.0001 104
CSF model −5 3.18 (0.002) −6.08 (<0.0001) 0.39 <0.0001 109
CSF model −6 −6.26 (<0.0001) 0.33 <0.0001 117

Results from the stepwise regression model. The variable with the highest p-value was removed from the model and the R2 and AIC of the new model assessed. For both plasma and CSF analyses the lowest AIC was achieved with models containing [18F]RO948 (tau-PET), Neurofilament Light (NfL), and baseline cognitive data (data highlighted with light orange). All models included sex, education, age, and baseline MMSE as covariates. Tau-PET = [18F]RO948 Standardized Uptake Ratio values in a temporal ROI; MR AD cortex = Cortical thickness in “AD signature cortex” (see methods for details); Aβ ratio = Aβ42/40 ratio. Biomarker values indicate t-values (p-values).