Figure 4.
Myeloid-Specific NLRC5 Deficiency Exacerbated Cardiac Remodeling Induced by Pressure Overload
(A) Gross morphologies of hearts from Nlrc5flox/flox (Nlrc5fl/fl) and LysM-Cre/Nlrc5flox/flox mice after 4 weeks of TAC. (B) The ratios of HW/TL in Nlrc5fl/fl and LysM-Cre/Nlrc5flox/flox mice after TAC (n = 10 per group). (C) Representative images of transverse area of cardiomyocytes detected by wheat germ agglutinin staining. Scale bars, 30 μm. The cross-sectional areas of cardiomyocytes were analyzed by ImageJ (NIH) (n = 10 per group). Ten fields per section from each sample were analyzed. (D) Relative mRNA expression of cardiac hypertrophy-related markers Anp and Bnp were assessed (n = 10 per group). (E to G) Echocardiography analysis of fractional shorting (E), ejection fraction (F), and LV mass (G) after 4 weeks of TAC operation (n = 10 per group). (H) Representative Masson’s trichrome staining and quantitative analysis of collagen volume of hearts from Nlrc5fl/fl and LysM-Cre/Nlrc5flox/flox mice after 4 weeks of TAC operation (n = 10 per group). Scale bars, 50 μm. (I) Relative mRNA expression of cardiac fibrosis markers Fibronectin and Collagen Iα were measured in heart tissues from Nlrc5fl/fl and LysM-Cre/Nlrc5flox/flox mice after 4 weeks of TAC operation (n = 10 per group). (J) Immunohistochemistry staining and quantitative analysis of cardiac fibrosis marker fibronectin in Nlrc5fl/fl and LysM-Cre/Nlrc5flox/flox mice with TAC operation (n = 10 per group). Scale bars, 50 μm. (K and L) Representative cytograms of F4/80+ CD64+MerTK+ macrophages in heart tissues (K) and quantitative analysis (L) (n = 10 per group). (M and N) Quantitative analysis of CCR2+Timd4− macrophages (M) and Ly6G+ neutrophils (N) in hearts from Nlrc5fl/fl and LysM-Cre/Nlrc5flox/flox mice after 1 week of TAC operation (n = 10 per group). (O and P) Quantitative analysis of Ly6C+ monocytes (O) and Ly6G+ neutrophils (P) in peripheral blood from Nlrc5fl/fl and LysM-Cre/Nlrc5flox/flox mice after 1 week of TAC operation (n = 10 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.