Table 1.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Iliotibial Band Using Knotless All-Suture Anchor Femoral Fixation
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| LET augments knee stability and can reduce the pivot shift when performed with ACLR in the ACL injured knee. | The procedure requires additional operative time and soft tissue dissection when compared to ACLR alone. |
| No allograft is necessary, as autograft IT band is used. | There is associated donor site morbidity with IT band autograft harvest. |
| LET may be performed at the time of ACLR and does not need to be staged. | There is a possibility to iatrogenic injury to ACLR femoral fixation when dissecting about the lateral epicondyle. |
| Use of a knotless anchor for femoral fixation is low profile and results in minimal surrounding soft tissue irritation | The graft may be excessively tensioned if the knee is externally rotated during tensioning. |
| LET with IT band may be useful in revision ACLR, where concern for residual rotational instability after index procedure is a concern for primary ACLR failure. | The IT band may have scarring from primary ACLR graft passage or fixation in the revision setting, making it difficult to mobilize. |
ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; IT, iliotibial; LET, lateral extraarticular tenodesis.