Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 14;25(5):1059–1064. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01495-0

Table 2.

Descriptive and comparative analysis of COVID-19% positivity (% positivity) among unaccompanied children at office of refugee resettlement emergency intake sites (EIS) from April 1–May 31, 2021

% Positivity (95% Confidence Interval)
Overall 2.47% (2.39, 2.55)
With ZP 1.83% (1.71, 1.95)
Without ZP 2.83% (2.72, 2.93)
By Venue Type
Dormitory 1.51% (1.40, 1.63)
Convention Center 2.02% (1.88, 2.16)
Soft-sided facility 3.44% (3.29, 3.59)
By Bed Capacity
< 500 beds 1.16% (0.96, 1.37)
500–1500 beds 2.01% (1.87, 2.15)
> 1500 beds 2.81% (2.70, 2.91)
Comparati ve analysis a
Controlling for EIS in dormitory venue type and > 1500 beds
With ZP 1.48% (1.31, 1.66)
Without ZP 1.96% (1.72, 2.19)
Controlling for EIS with ZP and dormitory venue type
< 500 beds 1.18% (0.91, 1.45)
500–1500 beds 0.81% (0.55, 1.07)
>1500 beds 1.48% (1.31, 1.66)
Controlling for EIS without ZP and > 1500 beds
Convention Center 1.38% (1.21, 1.56)
Dormitory 1.96% (1.72, 2.19)
Soft-Sided Facility 4.21% (4.03, 4.40)
Controlling for EIS without ZP and soft-sided facility venue type
< 500 beds 1.14% (0.82, 1.46)
500–1500 beds 1.54% (1.33, 1.76)
> 1500 beds 4.21% (4.03, 4.40)

a Significance was set at p < 0.05. Chi-square test for all comparative analysis described was within set p-value.