Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 14;2023(6):CD001506. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001506.pub5

Summary of findings 4. Hypertonic saline compared with amiloride for cystic fibrosis.

Hypertonic saline compared with amiloride for cystic fibrosis
Patient or population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Settings: outpatients
Intervention: hypertonic saline
Comparison: amiloride
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No of Participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Amiloride Hypertonic saline
FEV1: change from baseline, short‐term Outcome not reported.  
FEV1: change from baseline, long‐term Outcome not reported.  
LCI Outcome not reported.  
Mortality Outcome not reported.  
Measures of sputum clearance
 
Follow‐up: 60 minutes
There was no significant difference between treatment groups. NA 12
(1 trial) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa,b,c
 
Trial had cross‐over design.
Pulmonary exacerbations Outcome not reported.  
Adverse events Outcome not reported.  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 second; LCI: lung clearance index; NA: not applicable.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded once due to risk of bias: high risk of detection bias as participants could discern the taste of the intervention and limited information was provided about the trial methods (including whether a washout period was used).
bDowngraded once due to applicability: results apply only to those who can tolerate hypertonic saline, and the trial included only adults so results may not apply to children.
cDowngraded once due to imprecision: no numerical data provided and small sample size.