Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;68:1605763. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605763

TABLE 2.

Summary certainty assessment for modelled prevalence estimates of low back pain, neck pain, and knee osteoarthritis following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines 30 (Global Burden of Disease Study 2019–Australia, Brazil, Canada, Spain, and Switzerland [1990 to 2019]).

Country Condition GRADE criteria Range of modelled prevalence (95% UI) Overall certainty
Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision
Australia
 LBP Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Not serious Not serious 11.6 to 12.4 (10.2–13.9) Low a , b ⊕⊕○○
 NP Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Serious ↓ Not serious 1.3 to 1.5 (1.0–1.9) Very low a , b , c ⊕○○○
 Knee OA Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Serious ↓ Not serious 5.4 to 8.3 (4.6–9.5) Very low a , b , c ⊕○○○
Brazil
 LBP Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Not serious Not serious 6.7 to 8.7 (5.8–9.9) Low a , b ⊕⊕○○
 NP Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Not serious Not serious 1.9 to 3.0 (1.5–3.9) Low a , b , c ⊕⊕○○
 Knee OA Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Serious ↓ Not serious 2.7 to 5.4 (2.3–6.1) Very low a , b , c ⊕○○○
Canada
 LBP Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Not serious Not serious 10.1 to 12.4 (9.8–14.2) Low a , b ⊕⊕○○
 NP Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Serious ↓ Not serious 3.6 to 4.3 (2.9–5.4) Very low a , b , c ⊕○○○
 Knee OA Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Not serious Not serious 3.0 to 5.1 (2.6–5.9) Low a , b ⊕⊕○○
Spain
 LBP Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Not serious Not serious 10.1 to 11.1 (9.0–12.2) Low a , b ⊕⊕○○
 NP Very serious ↓↓ Serious ↓ Not serious Not serious 2.6 to 3.9 (2.2–4.8) Very low a , b , d ⊕○○○
 Knee OA Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Not serious Not serious 5.8 to 8.4 (5.0–9.6) Low a , b ⊕⊕○○
Switzerland
 LBP Very serious ↓↓ Serious ↓ Not serious Not serious 15.0 to 19.2 (13.1–20.3) Very low a , b , d ⊕○○○
 NP Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Serious ↓ Not serious 4.6 to 4.9 (3.7–6.2) Very low a , b , c ⊕○○○
 Knee OA Very serious ↓↓ Not serious Serious ↓ Not serious 6.0 to 7.9 (5.2–8.9) Very low ⊕○○○
a

Downgraded −1 for risk of bias, due to concerns about the credibility of the model, influenced by its conceptualisation and structure.

b

Downgraded −1 for risk of bias, due to concerns about the certainty and exhaustiveness of model inputs.

c

Downgraded −1 for indirectness, due to indirectness of model inputs with respect to the model, influenced by lack of primary data input studies.

d

Downgraded −1 for inconsistency, due to unexplained variability in modelled outputs.